CanesNow

Choose a blog

Hurricanes 5, Canucks 3

Bookmark and Share

RALEIGH — In a season that little has gone right, the Carolina Hurricanes were rolling for two periods and led by three goals.

Then came the third period.

But after surrendering a pair of goals in the third and killing a late penalty, the Hurricanes held on for a 5-3 win over the Vancouver Canucks, ending a five-game losing streak before 14,990 fans at the RBC Center Saturday.

Carolina forward Erik Cole scored an empty netter with 13.8 seconds left to put the game out of reach and notch the sixth hat trick of his career.

But bad thoughts did creep in; last Friday, the Hurricanes lost to the Atlanta Thrashers after taking a three-goal lead into the final period and then the next day, they lost 5-1 to the Buffalo Sabres after leading by a goal heading into the third.

“It crept into [the minds of] 14 or 15 thousand people, whoever came today,” forward Ray Whitney said. “It wasn’t just our 20 minds. ... Ten minutes of a period is what’s cost us at times for whatever reason. Mentally and confidence-wise we have to be a little bit better, a little bit stronger in that aspect.”

Still, the Hurricanes (6-17-5) came out ready, and for two periods, played some of the best hockey the team has played this season.

Vancouver (16-13-0), which came in having won four of its last five, scored first when forward Jannik Hansen fired from the right circle. The puck bounced over goalie Manny Legace’s shoulder and into the net at 12:02.

“That goal was early,” Whitney said. “You don’t get too worried about it. Obviously we played a pretty good first five minutes, 10 minutes and to have that one is kind of an unlucky goal so as a group we were just trying to stay positive and ignore that one.”

Whitney, who was given the game’s second star, scored 20 seconds later, whacking a backhander in on a pass from Eric Staal, who had a pair of assists. Whitney also had a pair of assists.

“I just swung at it real hard,” Whitney said.

The Hurricanes scored a pair of quick goals in the second period, getting Cole’s first goal on a snap shot inside the left pipe at 3:55. Forward Sergei Samsonov put the Hurricanes up 3-1 with a wrister at 6:06.

Cole’s second goal came late in the second period. As the last Hurricane to touch the puck, he was credited after his daughter’s godfather, Vancouver defenseman Willie Mitchell, kicked the puck into the net with goalie Andrew Raycroft trying to hold it. Mitchell and Cole dined together the night before.

“I might have to get a hold of that puck and give it to my buddy Mitchell there,” Cole said. “Dinner wasn’t that expensive last night. It doesn’t really matter who’s scoring goals, we just need wins.”

But a pair of third-period goals from the Canucks brought back those bad memories, with Steve Bernier scoring at 10:07 and Alexandre Burrows scoring at 14:45.

“They became more aggressive,” Staal said. “They were coming down the walls. Their ’D’ were jumping on every rush and we had to make some hard decisions with the puck.”

Vancouver went on the power play when Samsonov was charged for hi-sticking at 17:03, drawing boos from the crowd, who questioned the call.

“It’s a good thing we killed that thing off because that would have been real tough to take, but that’s the way it’s been going,” Carolina coach Paul Maurice said.

The Hurricanes now head out on a four-game, week-long road trip, with stops in Pittsburgh, New Jersey, Washington and Ottawa.

“I’m just glad we got a win here at home before going out,” Cole said. “This road trip is going to be a tough week for us and we’re going to have to play really well to be successful.”

The Hurricanes haven’t won on the road this season.

“It’s safe to say we’re overdue,” Cole said. ...

 

The Hurricanes were well on their way to playing a solid first period when Vancouver forward Jannik Hansen fired from the right circle, the puck bouncing over goalie Manny Legace's shoulder and into the net at 12:02.

But 20 seconds later, Carolina forward Ray Whitney swept a backhander in from the left circle to tie the game at 1-1, getting the puck from center Eric Staal, with defenseman Aaron Ward also getting an assist. ...

After a four-day break from games, the Carolina Hurricanes (5-17-5) host the Vancouver Canucks (16-12-0), in the only regular season meeting, at the RBC Center Saturday afternoon.

Carolina forward Jussi Jokinen, who practiced only once this week, on Friday, did not participate in the skate around. Forward Chad LaRose, who participated in practice as much as Jokinen this week, was on the ice, as was defenseman Bryan Rodney.

Rodney was called up from Albany on Thursday after Joe Corvo was injured on Monday night, suffering a cut that's expected to keep him out of commission for 2-3 months. ...

Indeed, Jokinen is the only scratch listed for the Hurricanes, who are starting a line centered by Matt Cullen, with forwards Tuomo Ruutu and Scott Walker, and defensemen Aaron Ward and Andrew Alberts. Manny Legace is in the crease.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Good vibe on the ice yesterday

The guys seemed really loose and relaxed from the start. I saw them joking around on the bench--didn't seem to panic or make a lot of mistakes. Don't know if this is the case, but it seems the break did them some good mentally.

Also, I have to congratulate Manny on a terrific game. He saved our bacon and he was definitely the better goalie. Congrats also to Cole, and a big shout out to Matt Cullen. He's consistently working so hard and hasn't given up on this team.

From what I saw on TV in the

From what I saw on TV in the third period was not a system failure, or breakdown of the 1-4 forecheck, but Vancouver Canuck's desperation and well executed offensive system that once puck possession was gained in the O zone the defencemen really pinch down leaving just the one defeneceman back. This was really evident after the 5 minute mark. They really went all out to try to score, and did score flooding the O zone and keeping prolonged puck possession. We did have a couple of nice scoring chances ourselves, but after spending so much time on the defense the Canes were more concerned in executing the line change once the puck was in deep, thus the Canuck's regained puck possession. I thought the Canes did a good job staying out of the sin bin in the 3rd until the phantom high sticking penalty was called. Also noticed that for some reason after Vancouver scored their 3rd goal, from the 14/15 minute mark they stopped the aggressive pinching down of the defensemen, they stayed back up above the circles just inside the blueline, even during most of the powerplay they had. Perhaps it was fatigue, but they were unable to play as aggressively as they did earlier in the period. Anyway, congrats Canes on 2 points earned, we looked healthier and I thought we skated better and suffered fewer braincramps!

Well, the 1-4 forecheck is

Well, the 1-4 forecheck is designed specifically to prevent the 5 man rushes from a desperate team. The Canes just aren't good enough at defense and the Canucks are too good at offense for this to work. On the other hand, if they kept the offensive pressure, the two defensemen on the Canucks would have to be conservative and wouldn't join the rush. But the side-effect of that would be that the Canes would have less defense playing the 3 forwards.

This is why I'm not the coach ;)

agreed

The Canucks are a pretty good offensive team, that is why they made a game of it.  The Canes played as well as they could for as long as they could, and what they did in the first part of the game was enough to get the win. The boys did a pretty good job of not crumbling over that total blown call on Sammi's  phantom high stick. Overall a good game for Canes fans. We just have to take these good games for what they are, a good game. Not a sign that the team is "coming around", just enjoy the win.

Maybe it depends...

I have to agree that the coach is pretty stupid to keep trying to play a failing system in the third period but you can also suggest the players should be able to play to that system, which they obviously cannot or do not want to do.

For me, I would rather a team continues playing the same way that got them into that winning position.

OBTW

The Rats won again tonight too !!! So lets keep it going...

Go Canes !!

The first and second periods

The first and second periods were great, just as they have been in many of the prior games. Everyone was thinking about the lead getting blown, even the players. And it appeared that it was going to happen. What I don't understand is why Maurice is so dim-witted. Is this the only time in the season that sitting on the lead actually led to a win (some luck was clearly involved that they got out with the win)? Almost every other time, it has failed miserably (see Atlanta and Buffalo games). Why does he keep trying it? Just stop, please. This team has a weak and badly positioned defense, and they will not be able to hold back the full-on rushes of good teams in the 3rd. They need to play offense and score goals to counteract their lack of defense (Washington does this). The reason they played so well in the first two periods is because the offense was aggressive, especially on the forecheck, and they had puck possession (if we have the puck, they don't!). Going into the third, the forecheck diminished into a one man forecheck while the other four players clogged the neutral zone. This is the 1-4 forecheck system I believe. Clearly, the Canes can not execute this forecheck system very well. Maurice should adjust and tell them to play another system.

Apart from the third period they played well (said that a lot lately!). The crowd was very loud and into the game. I was surprised at the turnout for a team doing as badly as they are and it being a Saturday afternoon game.

Also, Cullen is playing phenomenal as of late. He seems to be playing for a contract over the summer and he wants to stay. If he will sign for a reasonable price, he has to be kept. Him and Whitney are two of the UFA's that must be signed (assuming they are still on the team).

Staal is really returning to form. As long as he is getting assists, it still means that the Canes are scoring goals. I just hope that his outstanding play tonight had nothing to do with Yzerman in the audience. If he continues his play, the Staal haters will start going away.

Oh, and congratuations on your hat trick Cole! You deserved it.

 

One thing I noticed about

One thing I noticed about Vancouver: their puck possession in the offensive zone is really good. Excellent movement, crisp passes on-target, etc. In the third period when the Canes fell back into their defensive shell, it became a shooting gallery for Vancouver. I can see the point of the 1-4... if Vancouver got the puck in, the Canes couldn't get it out... so the Canes might as well clog up center ice. Well, that's classic Mo hockey from many years ago... a Mo team cannot win consistently without an excellent goaltender. Fortunately for the Canes yesterday, Legace played well enough.

Excellent summary and

Excellent summary and description of the game.  I only want to join in congratulating Cole.  He has been working the hardest I've seen him work since his injury.

Amen AD

Amen !! now i wonder what Monday's topic will be ? Wink

Go Canes !!

Well now

I wasn't home when the game started, and sadly did't get back until the start of the 2nd intermission. So All i saw was the 3rd period. And i agree the ref blew it...it was the puck and not Samsonov's stick...But Cole counter acted that with a empty netter...hehehe...and i am happy...the canes won, the rats & spokane chiefs last night won...gee almost too much of a good thing huh ???

Go Canes !!

Javier makes it sound like

Javier makes it sound like fans were booing Sergei for taking a high-sticking penalty when, in fact, we were booing the ref since it was bloody phantom penalty. Cancuck player (can't remember who) got hit by a puck - Samsonov was nowhere near him. So the raucous boos you heard was for the seriously blown call.

I'm glad I'm not the only

I'm glad I'm not the only one who wonders why Javier did not note WHY the fans thought the call was bad. It was because the puck - not Samsonov's stick - hit Burrows' face.

Many times the fans just complain about calls because they are being homers. In this case it was justified as the replays conclusively showed that no penalty was taken. If I was a reader who didn't watch the game or hear about the incident, I would have ZERO IDEA what the case was if I had simply read Javier's report.

 

The call

Man, I had never heard booing that loud before in the RBC Center. That call was just retarded. I don't even know what they were doing. They called a high-sticking penalty on Samsonov, and therefore they must treat the play like a high stick, and since blood was drawn on the Canuck, a 4:00 double minor should have been called. Yet, they gave him two minutes. So in the end Samsonov got a 2:00 high sticking penalty where blood was drawn and he never physically hit the player with the stick.

But watching the referee go into the corner of the rink trying to ignore all the booing, the replay on the jumbotron, and the players/coaches (that was the most animated I have ever seen Maurice) was pricelss. Haha.

You never hear the NHL refs

You never hear the NHL refs say "There was no infraction on the play."  Apparently, when that orange banded arm goes up and play stops, there is NO POSSIBLE WAY to call off an infraction.  Case closed.

 

No so with the NFL.  They actually give the refs the chance to say "there was no infraction on the play" in the event they threw the flag (probably a knee jerk) and then thought twice.

 

So, you get junk like this call.  They had to call something, and upon realizing the mistake, there was no way they could call 4 minutes.

I was thinking after the

I was thinking after the game that they should implement a way for the official (or maybe another official) to realize that he made a bad call and overturn.

But I don't think that the referee thought that he made the wrong call. On many occasions a referee will make a make-up call to balance out. While technically this is a bad practice, it is fair. Plus the referee had many oppurtunites to make a justified make-up call (Gleason getting hooked down behind the net pops into my mind). 

Yeah....Mo tried to blow

Yeah....Mo tried to blow it.

Keep him out of the locker room during the second intermission.

Born loser.

born loser

I know one is supposed to follow a rule about 'if you don't have something nice to say about someone, you shouldn't say it." I don't agree with everything that is happening with the team lately, but I won't get into this infantile name calling that some posters fell is necessary. It is old and tired. I keep reading the same drivel and these posters offer little in the line of constructive criticism.  We are all passionate and all share the wish for the team and it's players to succeed. Name calling and personal insults are childish. I'm sure that someone will write something in response to my post. Feel free to do so, but please refrain from this petty behavior when it comes to the coach, the general manager and the owner. Ignorance is, after all, bliss.

Due respect to Javier, but

Due respect to Javier, but I'm not so sure the Canes were dominant in the first period. Both teams had plenty of scoring chances. . . the Canes couldn't get shots on goal from their chances, while Legace did a good job on the Vancouver chances.

How about the "Geritol Line" for Yelle, Walker, and Brind'amour?

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

Javier Serna has covered sports for The News & Observer since 2007. He previously covered growth for the North Raleigh News, and sports at The Truth in Elkhart, Ind. E-mail Javier.
Advertisements