Staff photo by Chris Seward
RALEIGH — Talk about a badly needed and well-earned victory.
The Carolina Hurricanes outlasted the Washington Capitals 3-1 Sunday night at the RBC Center, giving Paul Maurice his first victory as coach in his second stint behind the bench and closing the gap on the Southeast Division leaders.
Eric Staal's goal with 4:09 left gave the Hurricanes a 2-1 lead. Ray Whitney then added a third goal -- his second of the game -- to seal a victory that trimmed the Caps' lead in the division to four points and ended a three-game losing streak.
"This hockey club has had an emotional week," Maurice said. "It's had a lot going on around it."
The Canes fired a coach, Peter Laviolette, brought in Maurice and lost two games. On Saturday, Jeff Carter fired in the winner off a faceoff in overtime as the Flyers beat the Canes 2-1.
Canes goaltender Michael Leighton, beaten on Carter's shot, had a season-high 38 saves Sunday. The biggest: stopping the Caps' Alex Ovechkin on a penalty shot with 1.2 seconds left in the second and the Canes leading 1-0.
"He played great. We knew it would be very difficult to beat him," Caps coach Bruce Boudreau said of Leighton. "We thought if we could get one by him and push it in to overtime, we'd be fine."
Staal scored off a Sergei Samsonov pass from behind the goal, beating goalie Jose Theodore at the post with a wraparound shot, and Whitney slapped in a shot from the slot to finish it off.
The Hurricanes took a 1-0 lead on Whitney's goal off a rebound of a Joni Pitkanen shot. It was the first time in 13 games the Canes had scored the game's first goal.
The Caps tied the score 1-1 on a power-play goal at 8:28 of the third. Nicklas Backstrom scored from the right circle on a pass from Ovechkin.
The goal came seconds after the Canes killed off 52 seconds of a two-man Caps advantage.
Leighton then stopped Ovechkin on the penalty shot. With the Canes on a power play, Ovechkin wound up with the puck on a breakaway and short-handed attempt. Pitkanen was called for hooking as he tried to stop Ovechkin from behind.
Ovechkin tried to fake out Leighton stick side and then beat him glove side but had little on the shot. He's 0-5 in his career on penalty shots.
"I'll be the last one to give him advice on how to score," Boudreau said. "All I knowis if it doesn't work, don't do it again."
The Caps dominated play most of the second period, keeping the puck in the Carolina zone. The Canes had few scoring chances, although Joe Corvo and Rod Brind'Amour did hit the post with shots.
After missing four games with a groin injury, Canes forward Scott Walker was back in the lineup. ... Defenseman Anton Babchuk left the game with an arm injury in the third and had his arm in a sling after the game.
"The most dangerous job in America is playing defense for the Carolina Hurricanes right now," said Maurice, who was not sure how seriously Babchuk was injured. "We've got guys dropping all over."

A Raleigh native, Chip has worked at the N&O since 1979 and is the Canes beat writer. He can be reached at
Comments
Baby steps is right
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 11:33 — HockeydogIt was a win, which this team needed. Maurice hasn't had a lot of time to work wit the team with the schedule last week. As the next game is Thursday we should see a team with more of Mo's concepts on the ice.
A Win !!
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 10:55 — esteban1949Heard the game and was pleased. I like some others who post here would like to see more phyicality in the Hurricanes, but the Canes are not a bunch of thugs or a team comprosed of The gashouse gorillas either...yet some flashes say of the "fictional" chiefs team from "slapshot" would be nice. Now don't tell me this curent roster doesn't have the ability to do that...cause the canes or any team has that kind of capability...what keeps us from doing that is: A: The rules & respect of them B: The staff behind the bench. personally I'd rather be tough but play with class and finesse than being a team of thugs...who is hated by all and respected by NONE... Go Canes !!
Much better
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 11:13 — rmmeliI watched it on Center Ice so I can only give the TV perspective. The whole team played with much more physicality and a much more disciplined approach in all parts of the game. They looked a lot better organized. The AHL players seemed to fit in real well. Not sure why they were not brought up before.
Maybe the AHL boys weren't
Wed, 12/10/2008 - 20:57 — CanarseMaybe the AHL boys weren't called up earlier because Rutherford was trying to convince Karamonos to fire Laviolette and didn't want to help him win?
Devious things happen all the time.
CanesRBoring, if they are so
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 01:06 — sanbarfieldCanesRBoring, if they are so boring why are you watching????
You Really Have to ask that?
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 02:56 — CanesRBoringWow, why does the name CanesRBoring throw so many of you for a loss? It's called an agenda.
I won't go through all of my reasons why. Most who are familiar with my name know why [ I made an earlier post about why on the Lavi press conference article], lots probably don't want to know nor care, and certainly most if not all the Caniac fans disagree with me. But since you asked...
Most Caniacs can't believe a person in Raleigh would not like the Canes. However, it is not them that I am trying to reach. It is the other fans that feel somewhat like I do at the type of playstyle and players this management has decided to go with.
I love the type of hockey which requires a high amount of finesse along with raw force of physical play. The new mixed in with the old, so to speak.
I believe most other teams in the NHL have adjusted to that type of playstyle except the Canes. The Canes management is stuck on the belief that small speedy skaters worked for the cup run so it will work now. Well the league adjusted to the new rules and physicality and size matters in today's NHL. The Cryniacs will cry that this team is the bomb and they have grit and size [someone even suggested that they are as big as the Ducks!].
But you have to remember they are avid fans who will cheer for the Canes just because they are a hockey team in Raleigh. I cheer for a for a certain style of hockey. It is the game that I cheer not the team.
You see, trying to express my opinions on say the Canes forum would not be as effective because most if not all people on that forum join because they like the way the Canes play. I do not. This place provides for a little less in the way of total Caniac support. A chance [ha!] at a more open minded debate.
I am not saying the Canes will finish last nor do I mean that all their players are mediocre. It is their playstyle that I cannot, with every inch of my hockey core, like.
I am an avid hockey fan, have played the sport, and wish that the Canes would be a team more in line with the rest of the NHL. Trust me, there is not another team that "fears" the Canes [not even Brookbank strikes fear...he sucks at fighting by the way]. They are considered the least physically imposing team in the NHL and that bothers me. Well, it bores me.
I still go to the games, but I have given up my sst. I do not wish for hockey to go away from Raleigh, but I also do not want mismanaged Franchises in the NHL.
He has a point...
Wed, 12/10/2008 - 20:59 — CanarseI'm a Canes fan, but the guy has a point.
I find him no more annoying than the super homers that think players like LaRose are top six forwards.
Boring is as boring does...
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 21:40 — AN0NYM0USIts a free country and you're entitled to your opinion. That said, you offer the same perspective---again and again and again. I'd find a fresh audience. Don't be a hypocrite. You've gotten feedback--move on.
As opposed to...
Thu, 12/11/2008 - 23:35 — CanesRBoringyou guys offering the same old pitiful comments about how you all like the canes. Nothing new, nothing fresh and certainly not much in knowledge.
I will not go away, nah I am here to stay with the rest of you guys pushing your agenda that you like midget style hockey!
You like Canes little guy style...fine. But what gives you the right to post your boring comments about a midget team as opposed to me posting my boring comments.
What was that word....hypocrite?
Not canes fan and you dont
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 18:13 — greg_98Not canes fan and you dont like the style of play,,,,kinda makes you an "internet troll I guess......
I guess...
Thu, 12/11/2008 - 23:07 — CanesRBoringtroll would mean someone who wants the Canes to be a team that I could be a fan of...ok...me so troll!
But what about you guys trollin around here spreading your love for non-physical hockey?
A better question...
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 12:08 — Puckin_awesomeWhy do you waste so much time posting negative blogs? If you're not a Canes fan, then go post on your respective team's blog. Every day you add your $0.02, usually with a very negative attitude, often accusing others of knowing essentially nothing about hockey. Your involvement here, starting with your screen name, is simply antagonistic. You have a right to your opinion, but don't be the rotten apple here.
[someone even suggested that they are as big as the Ducks!]. <-- Once again, you keep pushing your views, while stepping on others'. I showed you, statistically, that the Ducks only have about 6 lbs on the Canes. That doesn't make or break a team. This is not sumo wrestling. Now, if I were you, I'd probably throw around the words ignorant or stupid, but I'll refrain. Tis the season to take a chill pill. Yeah, that's right, I said chill pill. I'm bringing it back middle-school style! Now where the hell are my Z Cavariccis and hyper color t-shirts!?!
PS - 2008 Ladd (not 2007 or 2006) and Ruutu would be a dynamite combo, as irrelevant as it may be.
I Don't Like Apples!
Thu, 12/11/2008 - 23:36 — CanesRBoringI don't like apples, I prefer Sauerkraut!
I do not like them
CanesRboring I am!
P.S the fact that you miss my point about Ruutu and Ladd is my point...:)
Forget Mo bring back Ladd!
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 21:40 — CanesRBoringWell the Canes held it together long enough for an important win, albeit it wasn't the most exciting game from my standpoint [re-iterate my standpoint] Average play on both sides, not much consistent flow, but a win none the less for you guys which was sorely needed.
However,a past sore point for me was the release of Ladd and he is cleaning house in the Hawks game tonight. I would gladly trade Mo for Ladd any day! He exemplifies the player I enjoy. Anyway, I noticed Broobank ducked going against Brashear tonight. Good thing for him, he would have been flattened!
"I would gladly trade Mo
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 00:05 — irbefan"I would gladly trade Mo for Ladd any day!"
That's silly, Ladd is much too young to be a coach! :-)
Touche
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 02:34 — CanesRBoringTouche! Good point...:)
Ladd wasn't "released" he
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 23:17 — atrioneLadd wasn't "released" he was traded. And at the time of the trade, he was underachieving, IMO. He didn't fit in Lavi's system.
Your right bad wording on my part
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 02:53 — CanesRBoringI know he was traded, bad wording on my part.
As for your opinion that he was under achieving, no way. He was and still is young with loads of potential. Lavi and Rutherford was utilizing him the wrong way. He is a guy that thrives on physicality and size. So you are right about him not fitting in Lavi's and JR's small midget style of hockey. But I still say JR has more input as to who stays and who goes than you think.
Lavi liked a puck pursuit style but lacked size to balance it out and that I think JR is to blame and so went Ladd.
Ladd is getting good stats
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 22:06 — dustinlammersLadd is getting good stats playing on a pretty well rounded offensively gifted team. I would take Ruutu for Ladd any day of the week.
Better yet...
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 22:45 — CanesRBoringHow about Ruutu and Ladd on same team?
Now that would start to put a smile on my face when thinking of a Cane team! Never would that happen with this management, but it is a direction that I would love to see.
Ruutu I like and he is a maniac but he really has talent and doesn't need to be the [hate to use this term for fear of a Recchi comeback] "Recking Ball" he is being used as.
I shivered when I saw Ruutu give that hit against Brashear. I thought "you've done it now" Ruut, but luckily Brashy is used to that.
YEAH!
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 21:20 — lmit61GREAT game guy's. I almost forgot how good it felt to win! We really looked good tonite. Thanks for the effort!!!!!!
GO CANES!
Some of the calls and
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 21:07 — dustinlammersSome of the calls and "non-calls" in the 3rd period were a little frustrating. Two missed high sticks, both pretty blatant and then a no call on Carson being hooked on that 5-on-3 was bad. I thought it almost looked like Ovechkin felt he wasn't going to get a good shot on that breakaway and dove to get the penalty shot call.
Good effort by the boys and I thought Leighton finally stepped up and played tight. Let's hope (yet again) this is start of some more consistent play.
Not sure who will be called up to replace Babchuk now, maybe one of Gleason, Seindenberg, Kaberle can be back for Thursday... Looks like Anton's arm/shoulder could be serious enough.
Camera shy?
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 20:46 — Puckin_awesomeWhy, oh why, are the good games never televised?!?
Good work boys!
It was a GREAT game to see.....
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 00:49 — AN0NYM0USTry plunking down as little as $9.99--could have been there. It was a great atmosphere for 15,00+ fans. Talk about getting your money's worth. Canes fans need to put their money where there mouths are....
I've put plenty of $ where my mouth is
Mon, 12/08/2008 - 01:16 — Puckin_awesomeMy wife and I dropped $80 per ticket last night to see a pretty weak game. Add in the parking and some food and you've got yourself a $190 night. I'm on a bad streak of games this season. It seems the odds of winning greatly increase if I'm not there!
Carson has not looked out of
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 18:55 — dustinlammersCarson has not looked out of place at all so far...
Keep up the good work boys!!
Good observation.....
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 19:24 — bulldog424Carson really does look pretty good...and has logged over 10 mins of icetime. In fact, the overall D looks good so far against an explosive team.
1st goal
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 18:52 — Nico37Hopefully a good omen!
Time out in the first
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 18:38 — CanenutDo you think Mo wants the lead after 1?
FINALLY!!
Sun, 12/07/2008 - 18:36 — bulldog424A first goal and a Brind'Amour "+"....and against the Caps, no less! Baby steps back to success...... :)