Hurricanes Sergei Samsonov (14) and Brandon Sutter (16) can't score against the Bruins' Dennis Seidenberg (44) and goalie Tim Thomas (30) during the third period. CHRIS SEWARD - cseward@newsobserver.com
Check out uncut and edited photo galleries from the game.
RALEIGH — The Carolina Hurricanes missed a golden opportunity to pay back the Boston Bruins at the RBC Center Tuesday.
The Bruins (26-13-7) made off with a 3-2 road win a day after thumping the Hurricanes 7-0 in Boston.
The Hurricanes failed to take advantage of several scoring chances in the second period and failed to capitalize on a 45-28 shots advantage over the Bruins.
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas, who was named to the All-Star Game last week, had 43 saves and weathered the storm in the second period, when the Hurricanes had many scoring chances but failed to convert even one, keeping the game a 1-1 tie after two periods.
After Boston center Brad Marchand put the Bruins up 2-1 early in the third period, Canes forward Chad LaRose wristed in his ninth goal of the season camped off to the side of Thomas after Canes rookie center Jeff Skinner and forward Tuomo Ruutu hacked at the puck to the other side and in front of Thomas.
It tied the game at 2-2 at the 9:19 mark of the third period.
But it was a short-lived lead, as former Hurricane forward Mark Recchi earned his second assist of the night, passing the puck to forward Milan Lucic, who snapped in the game-winner, a power play goal, at 11:49. LaRose was in the box for elbowing towering defenseman Zdeno Chara.
It was Recchi that had beaten Carolina center Eric Staal early in the third period on a faceoff. He got the puck to Chara, who fired down to the net and Marchand back-handed the puck to go ahead 2-1 at 3:55 in the third period, igniting the handful of Bruins fans in attendance and quieting the rest of the crowd.
The Canes have reached the 40-shots plateau only twice this season, and they won those two contests. Tuesday's 45-shot output was the most they've mustered this season.
The Hurricanes gave up a power play goal at the 2:04 mark of the first period after Carolina forward Jussi Jokinen was called for tripping.
But Jokinen tied the game with a power play goal of his own at 18:39 in the first.
That power play, which at first sputtered, was in its waning seconds when Carolina defenseman Joe Corvo got the puck down near the net, where Staal, who drew in Thomas, was able to get the puck to the other side of pipes. Jokinen was there to wrist it in.
Jokinen, the NHL's First Star of the Week last week, now has five goals in the last five games (including tonight).
Thomas was penalized for roughing at the end the period after an odd-man rush by the Canes came unmoored with the pipes being dislodged. The Canes started the second period with a power play but weren't able to convert.
Bruins' defenseman Johnny Boychuk scored a power play goal at the 2:04 in the first period for the early lead.
Boychuk fired a rising slap shot from just inside the blue line after the feed from forward Michael Ryder. Note: Bruins' center Marc Savard, camped in front of Carolia goalie Cam Ward, was later given credit for having tipped the puck and then, even later, credit was given back to Boychuk.
The Hurricanes (22-18-6) are still in ninth place in the Eastern Conference standings behind the Atlanta Thrashers.
Forward Jiri Tlusty was a scratch. He's missed 15 games after a December injury, but has been available for two games now, including this one.

Javier Serna has covered sports for The News & Observer since 2007. He previously covered growth for the North Raleigh News, and sports at The Truth in Elkhart, Ind. E-mail
Comments
Great play, but Stupid Penalty
Wed, 01/19/2011 - 17:26 — hockey101The Canes came out last night with a better effort and it showed durind 2nd and 3rd periods. Of course with Chad taking a stupid penalty that pretty much killed the momentum after tieing the score and what about Joni leaving the net leaving Cam all alone when Boston made it 2-1. It's time for JR to make another trade. Lets get rid of Joni and Chad. One wants to take stupid penalties and the other shows up when he feels like it. We are in 9th place and if we can get points out of the next 7 games (treat this as a playoff series) we will be in good shape for a second half run.
One thing more, should Tom Rowe go also? Come on JR pull the trigger and get some players in here who want to play.
Joni P is playing like a guy
Wed, 01/19/2011 - 16:03 — mokimanoJoni P is playing like a guy that wants to be traded. So much talent and skill yet the guy's head is up in the clouds most of the time...his goose is cooked as a Hurricane...he is sure to be gone by the trade deadline, let's just hope that a decent NHL calibre defenseman is coming back this way in a trade for him.
Nice Game; LaR Lose Killed the Team with Another Stupid Penalty
Tue, 01/18/2011 - 23:18 — abramsdougThe Canes played well enough to win. The simple truth is that LaRose took yet another stupid penalty in the third period. It killed the team tonight. The video replay on FCS showed clearly that LaRose high-sticked Chara behind the Boston net after Chara let the puck go. It is hockey 101 not to take penalties behind the opponents' net; and it was crazy to take that penalty in terms of the flow of the game. Unfortunately, it is a pattern that is emerging with LaRose. Under Laviolette LaRose had a habit to penalties that had zero hockey sense to them. Over the past four or five games, LaRose is killing the team with dumb and ill-timed penalties. It has to stop.
Pitkanen not having his head in the game
Wed, 01/19/2011 - 09:45 — dustinlammersI'll agree that the penalty a poor one to take, I'll also agree that Pitkanen's play last night was plain bad. Lame passes, turnovers, bad pinches all the while looking disinterested. How many time last night did the forwards fore-check hard to cause turnovers, get the puck back to Joni at the point, only to have him throw it aimlessly at a Boston player? Too many. Pitkanen made the same coverage mistake in another game recently that cost us a goal against. Teams has figured out his "roving" style and know how to exploit it.
The officiating was typical playoff officiating last night - call the game tight in the first two periods and then let most things go in the 3rd. Skinner continues to be hooked/slashed/tackled/obstructed and no calls. I wonder how long this "rookie" initiation will last?
This was a game we had to win, but a continued hard effort in the next 3 games can help get us back into playoff contention. Most nights we play like that we win easily.
Loose Play
Wed, 01/19/2011 - 08:32 — JustListenenIf Pitkinen has been in the proper defensive position on the penalty kill, Lucic wouldn't have been uncovered in the slot. Stupid penalty -- yes, but the defensive breakdown let in the goal.
Pitkanen and the 3rd goal
Thu, 01/20/2011 - 16:42 — abramsdougWhen I watched the game (via computer b/c I was in Ohio at the time), my first reaction was that Pitkanen blew the coverage and that I had no clue what he was thinking. sittler27 later broke down the play in detail and I think he has it right. There were a number of breakdowns before Pitkanen. Harrison was chasing Recchi behind the net after being beat. There is no way Harrison is going to catch Recchi. Sutter needed to stay with Lucic. Pitkanen probably should have stayed at the crease, but Pitkanen also could reasonably assume he had help, including Sutter. It was a case of poor communications all around rather than Pitkanen being on Planet Xeno, at least as far as I am concerned.
Exactly!
Wed, 01/19/2011 - 08:50 — hockeyhickYou beat me to it! I agree. While it was a stupid penalty, LaRose was doing his job of bringing intensity. Sometimes in a game as emotional and intense as this one you can get over zealous. The Hockey 101 rule that was broken was Pitkanen leaving Lucic alone in front of the net to chase a player BEHIND the net that already had a player on him. I would take the intensity and the penalty any day over the bonehead defensive mishaps.
The Canes had their chances.
Tue, 01/18/2011 - 22:44 — ctillThe Canes had their chances. Thomas was great.
Yes he was...
Wed, 01/19/2011 - 12:16 — AllenH...and the Bruins defensive coveage in front of him was terrific. But I noticed early on one way we could counter: get somebody on the weak side to cover passes and rebounds. We did that exactly twice and scored TWO goals off of it.
How many times did we have 3 forwards on the same side of the net? How many of our many SOGs were telegraphed so soon that TT had time to take a potty break before setting up to stop it? How many of those shots were right at his chest logo? How much of the game did we play perimeter hockey?
I'm miffed at Pitkanen for his lackadaisical play and poor decisions, especially after spending $190 on a black Pits jersey! I 'spect he's gonna be outta here as soon as JR can find a decent trade for him. It needs to be for a solid DEFENSIVE D-man, we have enough puck-movers.