Stay-at-home moms may have been right all along when their maternal instincts told them they're best equipped to care for their children.
A new study from N.C. State University concludes that children of mothers who work outside the home have a significantly higher risk of health problems, accidents and injuries.
The study found that kids of working moms have a 200 percent increase in the risk of experiencing overnight hospitalizations, asthma episodes and injuries or poisonings.
Parenting is an intensely emotional subject that leads to feelings of guilt, inadequacy and -- just as often -- a sense of superiority among parents, particularly among moms who handle the bulk of child-rearing duties. The so-called mommy wars have heated up in recent years as the numbers of women with children under age 18 who are in the workforce has risen to more than 75 percent.
Dr. Melinda Morrill, the N.C. State economics professor who authored the study, warned against making sweeping moral judgments against moms who work outside the home. But she notes that parenting choices involve trade-offs that must be acknowledged.
"Maternal employment imposes a burden on a mother's time and may result in the poorer supervision or care of her children," Morrill's study says. "A child's health is at least partially a function of time-intensive activities such as healthy meal preparation and house cleaning."
Morrill's research looked at 89,000 kids age 7 to 17, examining 20 years of data from the federal National Health Interview Survey.
Morrill's research runs counter to previous studies that have shown that children of working moms have improved health. Those studies have said that kids of working moms benefit from increased income, from better health insurance options and from a boost in the mother's self-esteem.
But Morrill concludes that the earlier studies confused causes with effects, overlooking the fact that mothers of children with special needs or chronic health problems were often unable to work outside the home. In these situations, electing to become a stay-at-home mom did not cause or exacerbate the child's health problems; rather, the child's problems led to the mother's decision not to work outside the home.
Her study said parenting choices are based on complex variables, but in some cases a stay-at-home mom and a working mom may have very different temperaments and talents.
"A mother's decision to work could reflect underlying (and unobserved) ability, skills, or preferences, so that a mother that works may be different in important ways from a mother that does not work," Morrill wrote.

John Murawski has been a full-time newspaper reporter since 1991, with stints at Legal Times and The Chronicle of Philanthropy (both in Washington, DC), The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Palm Beach Post (in South Florida) before arriving at the N&O in December 2004. At the N&O he covers energy (nuclear, coal, renewable, efficiency), hydralic fracturing (or "fracking"), public utilities (both electric and natural gas) and health care. His beat includes Progress Energy, PSNC Energy, Piedmont Natural Gas, PowerSecure International, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Biogen Idec and others. You can reach him at 919-829-8932 or
Comments
Work is not worth it
Thu, 02/17/2011 - 21:11 — FlowerpowerBack when, corporations decided they needed cheaper labor, and they looked to women for that. Their desire for cheap help was accompanied by a nationwide promotional campaign, fraught with impetus for jealousy and guilt: women should get part of the action, yeah! women should have careers, yeah! women needed "adult" conversation, yeah! women should work, YEAH! In some ways, this was a boon--women who had once been trapped by their abusive husbands won some liberation from that--they could escape if they had the wherewithal to get away from the domineering rogue, but for many other women, work was a obstacle-ridden, noxious contest which wearied and stressed them for home life, which made them impatient with their children, which made them too tired to read at night and too stressed or too short on time to cook for their families. For many women, in short, the work world short-circuited their parenting, OR it made them tax themselves too much.
Then there was the search for quality day care. Some women had so many children in day care, it took their entire paycheck. Small babies had their diapers changed by paid strangers.
It was a scam for many of us. The CAREER defeated us, left us spent and lifeless by the side of Joy's Road; it stripped us of heart, and hope, and strength. I would NEVER do it again.
NOT SO FAST...
Thu, 02/17/2011 - 19:15 — ahmbdmThis working (and single) mom raised her son without illness...he and I do not get sick (no, it's not just dumb luck)...proper diet, exercise, and an annual flu shot are tickets to health--as well as to avoidance of lost income from time off or having to hire daycare substitutes.
Here's another POV
Thu, 02/17/2011 - 15:59 — TheLibertineHow many working moms load their kids up with antibiotics so they don't have to miss work? Over time this heavy reliance on antibiotics depletes a child's natural immunity to infection.
working Moms
Thu, 02/17/2011 - 13:24 — henryeIt stands to reason why working Moms have sicker Kids. many are put in child care and consequently come in contact with others who may have a cold or something. The good thing is that the Kids are building immunity..My sister in law kept a few Children and tried to keep them seperated when sick.. But when people have to work it is good to find a good place to leave them.
Smaller day care situations
Thu, 02/17/2011 - 11:59 — ladyknowallWhen my kids were small they stayed with a woman who watched four children. My two and two others. They had a home life with her and she grew to love them like her own. It was the best of both worlds. I remember when I interviewed her I foolishly asked her what kind of programs she had for my children. She just smiled and said "We play" Glad I stuck to my instints and let her care for my kids...and I was able to work and pay my bills with no guilt. The point I am making is some of us have no choice and we just have to choose our caretakers wisely
What you said in your
Thu, 02/17/2011 - 13:30 — henryeWhat you said in your comment .reminded me of my sister inlaw who kept about four and she loved all of them like her own. and when she moved out of state to be near her daughter after my brother died. She really missed them.and some of the children still stay in touch because they loved her too.