Carolyn Knapp, (right) listens as friend Carol French warns a group of listeners about the dangers of the gas industry's fracking program. Photo by Chuck Liddy
Two Pennsylvania farmers who leased land to shale gas drillers in their state painted a bleak picture of the gas industry this afternoon during the first of several presentations scheduled in the Triangle to discredit the gas industry.
Carolyn Knapp and Carol French warned that if North Carolina permits drillers to explore here, residents can expect conflicts with neighbors, lawsuits with gas companies, health complaints, a spike in crime and ruined property values.
The two farmers were hosted by two liberal advocacy groups -- N.C. Policy Watch and Clean Water for North Carolina -- at a time that North Carolina is emerging as the nation's next battleground over shale gas exploration.
"We're seeing farms losing 80 percent to 90 percent of their property value," Knapp said. "The amount of noise that comes from these operations is unbelievable. ... It's probably worse than living on an expressway."
Supporters of shale gas exploration see domestic gas reserves as an alternative to dirty coal and imported oil. North Carolina is believed to have a 1,400-square-mile deposit less than a mile underground concentrated west of Raleigh in Lee, Chatham and Moore counties.
The gas industry is making inroads here as well. It has intensified campaign contributions to North Carolina's elected officials, reaching an all-time high last year, according to a report issued today by Common Cause.
Meanwhile, supporters in the state legislature are are planning to take fellow lawmakers to Pennsylvania this month to visit with industry officials and to see gas drilling operations.
One of those slated to go is Rep. Chuck McGrady, a Republican from Henderson County. He attended the farmers' presentation and said he wants to hear all sides of the debate before deciding whether shale gas exploration should be legalized in this state.
"It was heartfelt and spoken by laymen who have real life experiences that would give a landowner pause," McGrady said. "It's a snapshot of one place, at one point in time."
The debate is over legalizing the primary methods of extracting natural gas trapped in prehistoric shale formations: horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking." The state is preparing a study of the laws and regulations that would be needed if shale gas drilling were allowed here.
The practice in Pennsylvania and has resulted in hefty fines for spills, accidents and other violations. Industry officials and regulators say the mishaps represent a fraction of the 4,000-plus wells drilled.
The state of New York, on the other hand, has taken a more cautious approach. New York suspended drilling in 2008 to study the issue and this year came out with a 1,537-page report that recommends declaring nearly 20 percent of the Marcellus Shale off-limits to drilling.
In the coming months the U.S. Geological Survey is expected to issue a more definitive assessment of the extent of North Carolina's shale gas reserves, which could spur greater interest from out-of-state energy companies. To date, more than 70 leases, representing over 9,000 acres, have been signed in Lee County, public records show.
The shale gas industry donated $95,100 last year to North Carolina's representatives in Congress, nearly double the previous year's figure, according to Common Cause, a policy nonprofit.
Sen. Richard Burr received $71,800 of the donations from such companies as Chesapeake Energy, DTE Energy, Halliburton, Anadarko and Chevron. Burr achieved notoriety earlier this year when he introduced a bill to abolish the U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency.
French and Knapp, the two farmers, said shale gas companies overstate the benefits of drilling and downplay the consequences. Neither farmer is collecting royalties from leases on their farms, because the companies haven't drilled yet or are not currently producing gas.

John Murawski has been a full-time newspaper reporter since 1991, with stints at Legal Times and The Chronicle of Philanthropy (both in Washington, DC), The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Palm Beach Post (in South Florida) before arriving at the N&O in December 2004. At the N&O he covers energy (nuclear, coal, renewable, efficiency), hydralic fracturing (or "fracking"), public utilities (both electric and natural gas) and health care. His beat includes Progress Energy, PSNC Energy, Piedmont Natural Gas, PowerSecure International, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Biogen Idec and others. You can reach him at 919-829-8932 or
Comments
Feed the water to the kids of the gas company execs
Thu, 11/10/2011 - 22:39 — qvorawLet's see how many execs will let me feed his kids water from around frackin' wells. When THAT happens, I'll believe the blokes.
collateral damage
Thu, 11/10/2011 - 22:13 — tenthhouseAfter the coal mine explosion in 1925, the little mining town of Egypt, NC changed its name to try to forget the loss of scores of lives. The methane to be fracked is in the same middle Triassic formation that the coal is in. Bad vibes remain today in this region.
Energy independence
Thu, 11/10/2011 - 18:00 — newenglandBetter way for NC to get to energy independence is to consume less energy. Raise the gas tax. Enact a BTU tax. Insulate homes. Revise building codes.
Consuming less energy is the same as producing more.
re Pennsylvania Farmers
Thu, 11/10/2011 - 17:43 — SFPNCNativeThey didn't object because they got very healthy checks for drilling rights, and probably continue to do so. They may not be getting monthly royalties yet, but the initial check simply for drilling rights is a very handsome fee for cash-strapped farmers.
My sister-in-law and her husband own one of the largest and probably best known sheep farms in western New York. She has a gas well sitting very close to where the sheep graze, and where feed is grown in a field close to the well. They have had no such problems, neither has anyone else in that area.
The only problems in the area have been legal disputes on who is paid when the gas lines run through property where no drilling takes place. If the values have dropped, it is because all real estate values have dropped there.
The opposition there is not from longtime residents, but from city residents -- mainly Rochester and New York City -- who have retired to the area and want to control the local governing bodies as well.
BRING IN THE HAND WRINGERS
Thu, 11/10/2011 - 17:30 — ViperRetBased on what I have read here and other places and some online research, the folks that praise the Occupy Wall Street loonies are out again. The drilling and fracking is FAR LESS invasive than the original oil wells and coal mines in Pennsylvania. I wonder HOW many of these folks have had methane in their water PRIOR to the drilling? I have hunted in Pennsylvania in the late 60 and the best stands were on the "Tailings" piles. These were huge mounds of earth that were "left over" from the mining and processing.
Yes, there needs to be Environmental Safeguards. As a retired Environmental Professional who dealt with PA Regulations and Regulators for over 20 years, as well as having plants in NY and several other states, I can tell you that PA and NY have very STRINGENT regulations and they also have a plethoria of regulators that like to "visit" to justify their existence. The fact that there are NO major reports of incidents or violations or fines speaks volumes about how the companies are handling this.
As to the "They'll SELL IT", this is NOT oil or Texas T. It is Natural Gas. YES, there is a market for LNG, but the cost of transporting it and compressing it and delivering it make it VERY expensive.
I guess that folks FORGET what happened in the 1970's. I do NOT. I could not get enough natural gas to run our furnaces to heat treat our fasteners and keep our warehouses filled. We were on rolling blackouts due to the fact that homeowners, as they should be, were on priority. I do remember one incident where our workers picketed a home owner that was heating his indoor pool with NG and they, the workers, were on furlough because we could not get natural gas.
I put in several Propane tanks as standby and we paid a pretty penny for the Propane. The fact that NG is now in the $4 range versus the $14 range just a few years ago ought to be enough for some folks to figure out that if we have NG, we can start to use OIL for other things, like Petro Chemicals.
In addition, all the folks that have been boycotting Coal (President Obama for one), should be very pleased that CLEAN NG is readily available and is NOW very competitive. That will keep utility rates down and also eliminate the need for the ultra expensive technology required to maintain Clean Air Act requirements that accompanies COAL.
The NG is a WIN-WIN for everyone. BUT, the press and the folks that are STILL protesting Sheron Harris have to have SOMETHING to complain about. Perhaps they should look at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and the Student Loan Program and then start a Protest called "Occupy Congress", specifically the Democaratic Congress that keeps perpetuating these Government Sponsored Enterprises where there is NO accountability or efficiency.
Pennsylvania farmers.
Thu, 11/10/2011 - 17:27 — henryeThe time to act is before the act. Why didn't they investigate the facts surrounding this industry and all the liabilities before committing themselves.I wonder where Brains have gone to in this country. because its highly evident that Brtains are as rare as Hens Teeth./today.
Shale Gas
Thu, 11/10/2011 - 17:21 — jepthasFarmland given over to energy production would be expected to lose its value as farmland, but to get its new value from an industrial process called natural gas production. Why would anyone expect to graze cows on industrial land anyway?