Biz Blog

Choose a blog

Nuclear mishaps will cost Progress, not consumers

Bookmark and Share

The performance problems that have hobbled Progress Energy's H.B. Robinson nuclear plant will cost the Raleigh utility $24 million.

The Raleigh-based electric utility agreed not to make North Carolina customers pay $24 million in costs associated with the outages, fires and other mishaps that caused the plant to be shut down almost six months of 2010.

On Thursday Progress and the Public Staff, the state's consumer advocate, announced an agreement that will require Progress to eat those costs.

The Public Staff said that the costs associated with the outages were caused by substandard performance. As a result of the forced shutdowns at the Robinson plant, Progress had to spend extra to generate electricity at less efficient power plants and to buy power from other utilities.

Power companies in North Carolina are allowed to pass through their costs of fuel to customers as long as those expenses are prudent. Electric utilities make the claims once a year for approval by the N.C. Utilities Commission.

It's only the fourth time in the state's history that a power company will not fully recover its fuel and related costs due to power plant performance. All three previous such disallowances took place in the 1990s, most recently in 1994 preventing Carolina Power & Light to recover $3.5 million for performance issues at the Robinson plant.

Even with the $24 million reduction, Progress residential customers will be paying about nearly $3 a month more for electricity starting in December because coal and other fuel costs increased overall. The rate increase will raise a typical household bill from about $102 to nearly $105.

Taking $24 million out of the equation shaves off about 70 cents from the monthly bill of a typical residential customer that uses 1,000 kilowatt hours of electricity in a month.

Progress spent nearly $1.2 billion on fuel and related costs in 2010.

In July, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission removed the Robinson plant form a watchlist of the nation's worst-performing nuclear plants. The plant has been operating without incident more than 300 days.

The performance downgrade had prompted a management shakeup at the Robinson plant, resulting in the dismissal of about a dozen executives and managers.

Within a 12-month period, the Robinson plant experienced four unplanned shutdowns, two electrical fires and a power failure. The NRC cited the plant with more than a dozen violations of NRC rules and procedures.

However, the NRC allowed the Robinson plant to continue generating electricity. The NRC said the violations were not significant enough to raise safety concerns.

The Robinson plant is based in South Carolina but produces electricity used in both Carolinas.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who will pay for nuclear problems.

As one person has already noted, at some point, these plants will have to be decomissioned and cleaned up.  The State's regulatory commision should ensure that the power companies are in a position to fund that, not the customers.  But the thing that concerns me is who pays for the accident that's not going to happen.  When the unimaginable does finally happen somewhere in the United States, a release of radiation contaminents will make land and houses uninhabitable for decades.  People who own businesses and homes in those areas will be forced out leaving their accumulated family wealth behind.  And no insurance company is going to reimburse homeowners when one of the plants spews radiation that condemns their property.  The State isn't going to pay, and the power companies will declare bankruptcy before they will pay.  Citizens living near these plants should petition their representatives to have these sites shutdown and the radioactive materials removed.

Nuclear cost

Has Progress been setting aside funds in escrow for the time when the plant is decommissioned?  Or will file bankruptcy so that the cost will be absorbed by the tax payers?

Cars View All
Find a Car
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Homes View All
Find a Home

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

John Murawski has been a full-time newspaper reporter since 1991, with stints at Legal Times and The Chronicle of Philanthropy (both in Washington, DC), The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Palm Beach Post (in South Florida) before arriving at the N&O in December 2004. At the N&O he covers energy (nuclear, coal, renewable, efficiency), hydraulic fracturing (or "fracking"), public utilities and health care. His beat includes PSNC Energy, Piedmont Natural Gas, Duke Energy Progress, PowerSecure International, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Biogen Idec and others. He has also contributed more than 30 book reviews on topics spanning botany, history, science and religion. You can reach him at 919-829-8932 or e-mail him.