Biz Blog

Choose a blog

N.C. WARN wants to subpoena utility executives

Bookmark and Share

N.C. WARN, the Durham-based nuclear watchdog group, wants to grill Progress Energy CEO Bill Johnson or another top-ranking company executive in a public hearing. And if the Raleigh-based electric utility resists, N.C. WARN wants to use subpoena power to force executives to submit to questioning.

N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network laid out its strategy in a filing made Wednesday with the N.C. Utilities Commission. The Durham group's request is part of the endgame in the proposed merger between Progress Energy and Duke Energy.

The N.C. Commission had denied N.C. WARN's previous requests for full hearings, but asked the organization to outline its claims for the legal record. The commission is expected to rule on the proposed merger soon, possibly this week.

N.C. WARN claims that a new hearing on the $26 billion merger is required because a great deal has changed in the months since the commission held merger hearings last September. N.C. WARN is the only one of 26 parties to the proceeding that are still fighting the proposed merger.

One of the N.C. WARN's contentions is that Progress and Duke have cut about 15 private deals with large customers in exchange for promises that those customers won't oppose the merger. The N.C. Commission is separately reviewing N.C. WARN's request to make those confidential settlements public.

Progress and Duke have requested a merger ruling by July 1, a time line that would require a commission ruling this week. They said they need to close the deal by July 8, the date their termination agreement runs out and either could walk away without paying hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If they still want to push

If they still want to push that subpoena, then do it. Be sure to have proper subpoena preparation and the process must abide to the law. It would be more efficient if they have a full document about it.

Yeah, I do agree on you.

Yeah, I do agree on you. Subpoena preparation is just the same as submitting Federal Subpoena to any individual as long as they are in line with the subpoena issues.
Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

John Murawski has been a full-time newspaper reporter since 1991, with stints at Legal Times and The Chronicle of Philanthropy (both in Washington, DC), The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Palm Beach Post (in South Florida) before arriving at the N&O in December 2004. At the N&O he covers energy (nuclear, coal, renewable, efficiency), hydralic fracturing (or "fracking"), public utilities (both electric and natural gas) and health care. His beat includes Progress Energy, PSNC Energy, Piedmont Natural Gas, PowerSecure International, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Biogen Idec and others. You can reach him at 919-829-8932 or e-mail him.
Advertisements