Bull's Eye

Choose a blog

Bob Wilson on Tracey Cline, Kerry Sutton and Mattie Ross

Bookmark and Share

The hearing on whether Durham District Attorney Tracey Cline keeps her job continues tomorrow. Here is an early look at Bob Wilson's column coming Sunday in The Durham News.

BY BOB WILSON

There is something of Mattie Ross in Durham defense attorney Kerry Sutton.
You remember Mattie Ross, if not from Charles Portis’ novel “True Grit” then from the John Wayne or Coen Brothers films. Mattie Ross of Yell County, Ark., was a never-say-die heroine of the golden west, and even the Duke came to admire her, though it wasn’t easy.

Kerry Sutton isn’t on a quest to find the outlaw Tom Chaney, but she is determined to apply the best of her ability to unseat Durham County District Attorney Tracey Cline. This hasn’t come easy, either. Cline, who has been waging a nasty war against her one-time mentor, Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson (“he has the reprobate mind of a monarch”) for months, is an elected official.

But not just any elected official. Removing a district attorney under General Statute 7A-66 is serious business in the state’s legal community, not to be undertaken lightly. In fact, only one other DA has been removed under the law.

That Cline has dishonored – nay, defiled – the office of public prosecutor with her vile attacks on Judge Hudson because he ruled against her in a couple of hot-button cases is a fact few would dispute. Lawyer Sutton had had her fill last year when she began her blitz against Cline, who was elected DA after the implosion of former DA Mike Nifong, he of the 2006 Duke lacrosse frameup.

The risks are immense for Sutton. If Cline isn’t removed, Sutton will face the wrath of a DA scorned. Of course, Sutton knows that, and to the credit of several other attorneys who have since taken up the cudgel with her, she remains steel-willed.
As Mattie Ross said, that’s true grit.

Whatever Tracey Cline’s fate at the hands of Superior Court Judge Robert Hobgood (son of the late esteemed Judge Hamilton Hobgood), Sutton will draw praise and criticism from her fellow barristers. Far more will praise her, I suspect, than will condemn her. In that respect, Cline has made the way easier for Sutton.

Kerstin Walker Sutton is a graduate of N.C. Central Law School, as is Cline. She earned her bachelor’s degree in communications at UNC-Chapel Hill. You might say she has communicated her intentions clearly and concisely in the Cline affair.

Like many other local attorneys, Sutton learned real law as an assistant in the Orange County DA’s office and similar positions. She even worked for a while for the Law Offices of James Scott Ferrin, who is not, as some no doubt think, an attorney who looks like actor Robert Vaughn. (There really is a James Scott Ferrin. He’s a 1990 Duke Law graduate.)

It’s possible that Sutton won’t succeed. But win or lose, the words of Theodore Roosevelt, speaking at the Sorbonne in 1910, ring true as much today as they did then.

Salute those brave souls who spend themselves in a worthy cause, said Roosevelt, those who “at the best know in the end the triumph of great achievements and who at the worst at least fail while daring greatly, so that their place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

For sure, no one will ever accuse Kerry Sutton of being a timid soul.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bob Wilson on Tracey Cline

While it's true that only one DA has been removed via the 7A-66 process, a Durham citizen submitted a 7A-66 affidavit to have Nifong removed.  Interestingly -- perhaps there is a story worth researching here (hint, hint) -- Judge Hudson, in Nifong's case, decided NOT to act on that affidavit, instead he put the 7A-66 process on HOLD for 7 months after deciding to let the NC State Bar handle the Nifong situation. 

Are Cline's actions worse than Nifong's??  I guess it depends on perspective   

Hudson is fully aware that the NC State Bar is investigating Cline. So, why not wait in her case?

While I agree that the court should be taking action on Sutton's 7A-66 affidavit, I also believe that, according to the statute, Hudson should have acted remove Nifong long before he did. 

Note that after Nifong was disbarred he announced that he would voluntarily leave office ---  in a few months.  It was only after higher state authority (the Governer) got involved that Hudson finally acted on the (7 month old) 7A-66 - to induce Nifong to leave.  Even then, Hudson allowed Nifong to leave voluntarily rather than removing him -- which allows Nifong to run for DA again some day.  OID

The 7A-66 statute is clear on what actions the judge should take and putting the removal request on HOLD is not one of the options.  Someone needs to ask Hudson why he felt that it was proper not to follow the law in Nifong's case and not Cline's. 

Attorney C. Scott Holmes...

should be given some credit. I think he was one that got the message out early and was the one that stated that this could be done.

So, show him a little love!

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

Mark Schultz is the editor of The Chapel Hill News and The Durham News.
Advertisements