Choose a blog

Tar Heels blow out Evansville 97-48

Bookmark and Share

CHAPEL HILL — North Carolina hadn’t had a game like this in a while – one in which coach Roy Williams could give his reserves significant playing time and experiment with different lineups without much thought or worry about the final score.

Days after playing what’s likely to be remembered as one of their most difficult games of the season, the Tar Heels on Tuesday night played what could be remembered as one of their easiest – a 97-48 victory against Evansville in which UNC (7-2) built a 30-point halftime lead.

Leading into Tuesday, North Carolina’s three previous games had featured plenty of drama.

There was the 10-point loss against UNLV in the Las Vegas Invitational, then a 60-57 victory against then-No. 9 Wisconsin here last week. Then came the 73-72 loss at No. 1 Kentucky on Saturday in a game that felt – and looked – more like early April instead of early December.

There was no such drama here at the Smith Center on Tuesday. Evansville (3-4), which opened the season with a victory against Butler and then outscored Indiana in the second half of a 21-point loss, never put up much of a fight. Not early, not after falling behind by 30 at the half and not late, when UNC expanded the lead with its backups.

During its most competitive games this season – the three against UNLV, Wisconsin and Kentucky, and the one earlier this season against Michigan State – UNC has primarily used an eight-man rotation. Against Evansville, 11 players received at least nine minutes of playing time.

Patrick Crouch, a senior walk-on guard from Asheville, entered the game without about four-and-a-half minutes to play. About two minutes later, the rest of the Tar Heels’ walk-ons joined him on the court.

Crouch and his fellow walk-ons helped create what little drama there was in the final minute. Crouch turned an Evansville turnover into a fastbreak lay-up, which put the Heels within three points of 100.

And then it began: “We want biscuits,” the crowd at the Smith Center began to chant, referencing a local fast food restaurant’s promotion that goes into effect when UNC scores 100 points. Alas, though, Crouch missed a 3 with about six seconds to play.

It was one of the Tar Heels’ few disappointments. Harrison Barnes led five UNC players in double figures, with 17 points. Reggie Bullock, the sophomore guard, added 15 and John Henson (13 points and 12 rebounds) and Tyler Zeller (12 and 10) both finished with double-doubles.

Zeller finished one point shy of breaking the 1,000-point mark for his career.

The Tar Heels dominated statistically in every facet. They finished with twice as many rebounds as Evansville, and also held the Purple Aces to 25.8 percent shooting.

The low point of the game for UNC came with 11:36 to play, when freshman guard P.J. Hairston left the game with an apparent right ankle injury. He was helped off the court, then left the Tar Heels’ bench. He returned a few minutes later with ice wrapped around his right ankle. 

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

since we've had no bowl threads ...

anybody else thinking (scratch that ... know) UNC got a better bowl opponent than ncsu ?? 

Eh

They wanted to let UNC enjoy the opportunity while they still can.  The Heels won't be allowed to go bowling next year...and who knows, maybe the year after that too.

Anyways, quite the obsession over a team that you and all your buddies claim not to care about.  We're just proud to be bowling, especially after so many folks said there was zero chance for us to go to a bowl this year.  Also, Carolina got picked on for both of their recent Charlotte bowls because they were supposed to be (at least, according to UNC and their fans) a "darkhorse national title contender" that was knocking on the door of elite college football status with all that unrivaled talent.  Oh, UNC also had to cheat their butts off to get there.  How did that banner go again?  "They sold their souls for two Tire bowls".  Still a classic.

i dont know

seems like made up mess to me.

"If" the "cheaters" had

"If" the "cheaters" had managed to remain on the team and played the entire season, there is no doubt in my mind that UNC would have gone undefeated or 11-1 and won the ACC.  Wrong or Right the talent was definitely there and in place to do it. Just being objective.

Ha

No doubt that they would have gone 12-0 or 11-1 and won the ACC?!  This is a perfect example of why there is such a large group of folks that consider themselves "ABC" fans.  Such arrogance from a fan base that hasn't seen a conference championship in over 30 years.

 

Anyways, your comment about not having the cheaters on the team is a moot point, considering the fact that Carolina went to the Music City Bowl that year...not the Meineke Bowl in Charlotte.

We will see if you are right

We will see if you are right or wrong. You are definitely the champion of ABC bait/hate hyperbole on this site. Maybe the sanctions will be less severe then you think. I am going to have to smoke you outa the 'tower' again.

Personally I am looking forward to seeing the back side of Shoop and with an experienced QB and O-line and the return of Gio. it should be an interesting season offensively. The Heels will have to put up some points to make up for defensive losses. It will be nice to have our field goal kicker back as well. I am really looking forward to FB and the season isn't over yet.

Its kinda weird but BBall just doesn't seem to matter until Jan.

Hey

I won't deny it, I'm all ABC!  But you shouldn't deny that I've been right more often than not regarding the whole UNC scandal.  Just months ago you guys were arguing with me that Butch would be around much longer than TOB...not sure if it was you or Surfer that said he would be coaching UNC until at least 2017.  Haha, good one.

Oh, and the only time you've had to smoke me out of the tower was during our last coaching search =) ...but I think we ended up with a decent find in the end.

I agree and a better bowl as

I agree and a better bowl as well. Belk is a good fit for State though. The woofies will pack the place. Louisville is playing pretty well at the moment. It should be a good game. I find it interesting that after receiving a bunch of garbage from a lot of State fans ( besides certain outstanding Pack fans and alums ) about the Heels always ending up in Charlotte, that suddenly it seems like the best bowl ever.

good fit

Yep, a good fit for the "best program in the State", hehe.

Considering

That with 6 minutes to go in the 3rd quarter of the last game of the season it looked like no bowl was in the cards, we'll take the Belk Bowl. Looking forward to this year's Bowl pool.

Well . . .

Well, I didn't expect a close game, but after the first few minutes it was like watching Jerry you-know-who in the you-know-what; you know, just horsin' around.

Ummm, NO

I have no idea in the world what "Jerry-you-know-who" is and no idea in the world what "you-know-what" means. And, I don't really care.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.

About the blogger

Andrew Carter is the University of North Carolina beat writer for the News & Observer.
Advertisements