You may also like Canes Now | Balls and Strikes | Preps Now | Campus Notes
'); } -->
The number of games between ACC teams and Division I-AA teams will double this season.
Three ACC teams — Clemson, Florida State and Georgia Tech — have the audacity to play two Football Championship Subdivision, or FCS teams in the politically correct vernacular.
That can't be what the NCAA powers had in mind when they approved a 12-game regular season in 2006? Or was it?
When the NCAA approved the 12-game schedule, it also allowed I-A teams to count wins over I-AA teams towards their bowl-eligibility total in every season (previously, they could only be counted once every five years).
With no deterrent in place for playing I-AA teams in place, the number of ACC vs. I-AA games went from nine in 2006, down to seven in 2007 and back up to 14 this season.
The 12th game, which gave the ACC room for four nonconference games, was added to maximize football revenue, which in turn keeps athletic budgets churning. Most Bowl Championships Series teams — except for the Pac-10 — will only use the 12th game, which was previously only used when the September calendar cooperated, as a home game.
Since the price of bringning in a lower level I-A team, like ones from the Sun Belt, can cost between $750,000 to $900,000, BCS teams have opted to pay half of the premium price for I-AA teams.
So on Sept. 6, the second week of the season, five ACC teams will play I-AA teams. It's not hyperbole to argue that will be the worst week of college football in ACC history.
The I-A vs. I-AA games need to go. We've had our "Appalachian State Moment," now let's move on.
The coaches don't like the games because they are supposed to win against an inferior program with fewer scholarships. And when they lose — Richmond beat Duke in the 2006 opener — the season's sunk.
The players don't like the games because they don't recognize the team they're playing.
The only winner is the budget. The home team will clear at least $1 million at the gate (because these games are wisely combined with games fans actually want to see in season-ticket packages) and presumably will get an easy win.
The real loser is you, the fan. You're the one paying to watch Clemson-The Citadel, Furman-Virginia Tech or Western Carolina-Florida State. And as long as you continue to pay for it, the games will continue to be part of the schedule.
Virginia Tech AD Jim Weaver understands the I-A vs. I-AA dilemma. He tries to balance those games with a major Division I-A opponent. Virginia Tech played LSU last season and travels to Nebraska this season.
"I have no problem with it," Weaver said. "Some of the I-AA teams need to play I-A to stay viable."
Weaver's altruism is admirable, more admirable than the NCAA's whose semantic ruse of changing I-AA to FCS before last season allowed them to market their national championship game as the "Division I" football
championship (if you don't believe me, check out the logo at midfield from the Appalachian State-Delaware game).
But Weaver also has ulterior motives for lining up the likes of Northeastern and William & Mary, which VT has beaten by a combined scored of 82-3. Other than Duke, the ACC is 15-0 against I-AA teams since 2005.
"You're putting your own university at a disadvantage if you don't play a I-AA program because the other teams are," Weaver said.
The ACC ADs talked this spring about using the 12th game as an extra conference game, expanding to nine ACC games for the next round of television contracts. (Side note: If the ACC did add a ninth conference game, following the lead of the Pac-10, it wouldn't eliminate the I-A vs. I-AA games but create more.)
The conference's ADs universally dismissed the idea because it would create an imbalance in home and away ACC games. So even though Virginia Tech, to use an example, would get five ACC home games in 2010, it wasn't worth the financial trade of having to play five ACC road games in 2011.
"It would help make scheduling easier," Weaver said, "but it creates an imbalance in the conference on an annual basis."
Virginia Tech didn't write the myopic scheduling song, it's just singing the chorus.
Give the Hokies credit in one regard. They have the courage to play the best I-AA team in the country, Appalachian State, who will make the short trip to Blacksburg in 2011.
In the meantime, enjoy Sept. 6.
| ACC vs. I-AA | |
| Aug. 28 | Jacksonville State @ Ga. Tech |
| Aug. 28 | Charleston Southern @ Miami |
| Aug. 30 | Delaware @ Maryland |
| Aug. 30 | McNeese State @ UNC |
| Aug. 30 | James Madison @ Duke |
| Sept. 6 | Furman @ Va. Tech |
| Sept. 6 | Richmond @ UVa |
| Sept. 6 | The Citadel @ Clemson |
| Sept. 6 | Western Carolina @ FSU |
| Sept. 6 | William & Mary @ N.C. State |
| Sept. 13 | Chattanooga @ FSU |
| Sept. 20 | S.C. State @ Clemson |
| Sept. 27 | Rhode Island @ BC |
| Oct. 11 | Gardner-Webb @ Ga. Tech |
J.P. Giglio covers the ACC for the News & Observer, where he has worked since 1997.
Comments
DUI Law and public relations
Sat, 08/15/2009 - 12:53 — dsevv1Go hand in hand - consider this, you get a DUI so you find a DUI Lawyer Los Angeles - after the DUI Lawyer helps you get your license back and helps get you sober, you need a Los Angeles Public Relations firm to help get your public image on track! If Lindsay Lohan can do it, so can you!
Idiocracy
Thu, 08/28/2008 - 10:10 — Lina (not verified)What's I-A and I-AA? Didn't the NCAA axe those terms over a year ago? Yup, words do matter. It's not a matter of being PC; it's a matter of using correct terms as defined by the NCAA. I-A/I-AA is dead. Get over it. Using anacronistic terms just makes you sound out of touch. But, hey, whatever floats your boat. Enjoy your sarsparilly as you watch Wake Forest College take on Trinity College and North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts.
cheddar ****
Wed, 08/27/2008 - 21:24 — Chad (not verified)I can not believe that this guy is actually allowed to write for a newspaper. He has more knowledge about the new Abercrombie fall line than he does about football. You should seriously think about transferring this idiot to the fashion section. What a joke!
P.S. Nice flavor saver tool! hahaha
Just a note on SAT scores at App and State
Thu, 08/21/2008 - 10:15 — JamesinWillowSpringsPer App's admission's site regarding the 2006-07 incoming freshman class:
(http://www.admissions.appstate.edu/process/hs.html)
* Average Freshman high school GPA: 3.73
* Average Freshman SAT: 1131
* Freshman Enrollment: 2,716
Per the Triangle Business Journal's article from 10-05-07 regarding State's declining SAT scores:
(http://triangle.bizjournals.com/triangle/stories/2007/10/08/story2.html)
"The average SAT score for students entering NCSU this fall is 1174. That is three points fewer than last year's average of 1177, and it marks the lowest average SAT score for an entering freshman class at the school since 1998. (1195)"
So even in a period of declining SAT scores due to ballooning incoming class sizes, State's average SAT scores are still more than 40 points higher than App's.
FWIW.
As one who has watched App
Mon, 08/25/2008 - 17:27 — App Prof (not verified)As one who has watched App football from the stands and the classroom for 25 years, I offer the following:
First,
yes App fans should take a deep breath and dial it back a notch or
two. We'll be good this year, but last season was special (even
with Armanti either out or struggling with injury for half of it) and
probably won't be repeated. Also, as we increasingly get big-time
football on campus, money will dominate, students and faculty will get
the worst seats and parking, fat-cat alumni will scream for wins, and
eventually we'll have all the scandals that abound at FSU, Miami, and
Clemson. Fact of life: You shake a big-time athletic
program real hard and something unsavory always falls out. Not at
Duke? Well, I did say "big time."
Second, the N&O can be forgiven for not covering Appalachian
football recently. Heck, if you had to watch Terrible Triangle
Trio every week, you'd forget what real football looks like, too.
(BTW, the UNC team that beat playoff-bound JMU was essentially the same
team whose stalwart defense held a mediocre Furman squad to 42 points a
year or so earlier, right?)
SAT scores. Maybe NCSU's
are a few points higher (gotta account for the math geeks in
engineering), but the numbers listed here are so close to ASU's that
the difference is insignificant, especially since NCSU has well over
twice our enrollment. No question that ASU is now admitting
its best students ever. Take it from someone who knows and who
hates to admit that athletics, especially the football program,
probably deserves some of the credit.
BCS v. FCS. Of course it's about money there, Mr.
Obvious. What the heck else would it be about?
However, it should be noted that ASU has never shied away from playing
BCS teams--big payday or not--and while we've only beaten Wake (like a
drum) and that community college in Ann Arbor recently, we've
played close games against Auburn (really had them beaten until the
very end) and LSU and did reasonably well against Kansas, all without
Armanti Edwards who has yet to be stopped by anyone in any
division. So, I wouldn't be so quick to say that we'd get pounded
week in and week out in the ACC. Give us the extra scholarships
and the accomopanying depth and we'd take our chances.
Finally,
one of the Charlotte Observer sportswriters had what I thought
was a darn good idea last season. Why doesn't Steve Spurrier and
USC schedule the Apps and play the game in Charlotte at BOA (or
whatever they're calling it this week) stadium? Or UNC could do
it. Fan bases from both teams would turn out, lots of money would
flow to both schools, and it would be a spectacle to boot. Any
takers?
you lost
Thu, 08/21/2008 - 08:50 — the facts (not verified)"To start I will address the comment made about "Appalachain losing to a 3-9 NC State team. The team that took the field that day is no where in comparison of the team that took the field two weeks later as Armanti Edwards became the starter and has since led the team to a 22-2 record as a starter. That same team is the one that took the field on September 1st 2007 and beat the number 5 ranked team in the nation, a feat I doubt any NC State team could have accomplished in the past 4 years." Make all the excuses you want, the fact is, you got beat by a sorry 3-9 NC State team.
Re: The Little Man
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 13:09 — ASU-Alum82 (not verified)If you think we, ASU fans and Alums, hate the ACC you are wrong. Ok there may be some. And during basketball season there is no better ball played than in the ACC. What bugs me are fans of "Big" program schools who think that great sports programs can't exist outside their campuses. Quality exists at all levels. Its good that you are as passionate about your teams and conference as we are about ours. But don't look down your nose at us because we don't stack up dollar for dollar. Its good that smaller programs can make bigger programs gun shy to play them. Brings them down to earth and makes them realize that on any given day the outcome is decided when the game is over and not before the opening kick off.
The Little Man
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 10:51 — gvillegatrthis such a stupid argument you App fans or graduates put up.
In your closet (in-state App fans or graduates) you'll find a UNC, NCSU, DUIke or WFU t-shirt, hat, jersey or sweat shirt. you'll also find yourselves rooting like all heck for one of those teams as soon as round ball season starts and may even have family members who have tickets to these games and find yourslef in one of those seats come Jan - Apr.
Just do not lie to yourselves is all i'm saying. Lie to this board all you want to though!! B/c i've never seen so much traffic in a year!! keep up the good work so called "ACC haters!!"
What is your point?
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 16:01 — FB (not verified)What is your point?
J.P. Giglio
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 10:32 — Pac-10 (not verified)The Pac-10 laughs at ACC football. The Carolina & Duke football programs are a complete joke. App State would torch 75% of the teams in the ACC.
What a clown! Nice picture J.P.
ASU Football
Thu, 08/21/2008 - 23:49 — Anonymous (not verified)Bring it on ACC, I don't see any of your teams lining up to play ASU. I guess you don't want your season ruined like Michiagan. I remember playing WAKE and selling out the stadium, winning and we're no longer invited back. GO APPS beat LSU (no ACC takers).
VT isn't THAT brave
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 10:24 — Pack fan in Boone (not verified)Notice that the VT-App game is scheduled for 2011 - after Armanti Edwards leaves. As things stand currently, it is hard to see when ASU won't be a national title contender, and a threat to any mid-level BCS team that doesn't come to play, but it is Edwards that makes them a transcendent team. If VT moved up into the 2009 slot that LSU vacated, that would show some huevos.
If mixed-division games aren't going away, it would really be great for students at all the schools if NC State and UNC-CH would schedule ASU and WCU once every four years. But if they are scared of the ASU side of that idea, VT and UT are good fallbacks for App - Knoxville and Blacksburg are both about the same distance from Boone as Raleigh is.
Sometimes A Computer Can Determine Who's The Best Team
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 10:15 — Craig (not verified)End of 2007 Season Sagarin Rankings
#44 Appalachian State
#51 Maryland
#59 Georgia Tech
#64 East Carolina
#68 Carolina
#69 North Carolina
#109 Duke
ASU-Michigan
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 09:43 — JPDOhioI've had a ton of respect for Appalachian State, even before they pasted my Youngstown State Penguins a couple of years ago in the playoffs. I was at Ohio Stadium last year for the Ohio State-YSU game last year and the loudest cheers happened when the score of the ASU-Michigan game was posted. I swear that if they would have streamed the Michigan game on the scoreboard, everyone, including the players would have stopped to watch.
J.P. a friendly suggestion
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 09:24 — Preston (not verified)J.P. a friendly suggestion for you, stick to talking about UNC & Duke, you've shown you don't know too much about the FCS. It's best not to talk about subjects you don't know much about, it makes you look dumb.
JPG
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 14:41 — melvinfurd1st, JP isn't a UNC or Dook man.
2nd, JP is fair and objective in his articles - this one included.
3rd, there will always be people whose lack of perspective does not allow them to see the fairness and objectivity.
Wrong, Dead Wrong
Thu, 08/21/2008 - 13:20 — RDM07 (not verified)J.P. may be a good writer, maybe a great one...and maybe he covers the ACC wonderfully. However, his piont here is that FCS opponents make for terrible games that the ACC just dominates. Well, that depends. Let's just say, that for pre-season, the NFL had one warmup game against a FBS team. Now if the Redskins wiped the floor with NCSU and then someone stated how uncompetitive these games are, while ignoring the Dolphins being pushed to the limit by LSU ... is that really making the point or missing the point. Yes, ACC teams (other than Puke) playing WCU or VMI is a joke. But one of the instate ACC teams playing JMU, Furman, App, UMass, North Dakota State, Richmond, etc. is not. They are and have been competitive games for the most part (at least more competitve that beating up on Duke, and noone is saying they should drop the Devils from the schedule). J.P. is argueing a half-truth, and a somewhat valid point, but misapplying it to a group has a whole. All FCS teams are hugelty inferior to the NC ACC powerhouses (snicker). Does he also think all white guys can't jump (or worse)? I'm sure he does not and I'm not implying that he is a bigot, but to make a blanket statement that all FCS/ACC games are decided before the coin toss is nuts. Then he backtracks but saying "oh ASU and Duke is not included". Either have the guts to stand by the statement or admit you made a bone headed statement. I can assure you, no Coach or player worth a darn takes these games lightly. I just wish the guys with a jounalism degree would not.
Lets be realistic...
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 09:14 — Stephen (not verified)App fans are riding high no doubt. SoCon football is great and the ACC and SEC both grew out of it historically. Crowning a championship on a field of play is of course superior to the BCS but...some of the banter has gotten completely unrealistic however. It is no surprise that the most inflamatory statements are ususally posted by an Anonymous. Let's remember that App followed up the Michigan win with a loss to Wofford. 4-8 UNC crushed a playoff bound JMU team. What is the overall FBS/FCS record? Just ask Jerry Moore how his team matches up with LSU. That is realism. There is no player at App who wouldnt have wanted to go to a Carolina or State first if they were offered a chance to play their preferred position (see Armanti Edwards.) Of course App can rise up and upset a team here or there but week in and week out they would get pounded in the ACC. Its about players and talent not fan bragging. Look at the NFL draft results if you dont believe me. Also why isnt there more talk about playing ECU or Holtz dodging App instead of calling Carolina chicken. That is where you need to start first and the Pirates would be favored also. I foresee App joining Conference USA and making a rivalry with ECU if they ever get a chance to move up though. I wish the ScCon schools the best but if Carolina and State are supposed to do favors and play them, then Western should be given first crack. They need the help!
Lets be realistic...
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 09:09 — SoPinesHeel (not verified)App fans are riding high no doubt. SoCon football is great and the ACC and SEC both grew out of it historically. Crowning a championship on a field of play is of course superior to the BCS but...some of the banter has gotten completely unrealistic however. It is no surprise that the most inflamatory statements are ususally posted by an Anonymous. Let's remember that App followed up the Michigan win with a loss to Wofford. 4-8 UNC crushed a playoff bound JMU team. What is the overall FBS/FCS record? Just ask Jerry Moore how his team matches up with LSU. That is realism. There is no player at App who wouldnt have wanted to go to a Carolina or State first if they were offered a chance to play their preferred position (see Armanti Edwards.) Of course App can rise up and upset a team here or there but week in and week out they would get pounded in the ACC. Its about players and talent not fan bragging. Look at the NFL draft results if you dont believe me. Also why isnt there more talk about playing ECU or Holtz dodging App instead of calling Carolina chicken. That is where you need to start first and the Pirates would be favored also. I foresee App joining Conference USA and making a rivalry with ECU if they ever get a chance to move up though. I wish the ScCon schools the best but if Carolina and State are supposed to do favors and play them, then Western should be given first crack. They need the help!
ACC should be FCS anyway
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 06:27 — FCS Rules (not verified)I don't know what the big deal is. It's not like the ACC is a football conference. The big name football programs view ACC teams as weak. Maybe the ACC should move to FCS where their teams may stand a chance of winning a national title. I think you will be suprised with the outcome of some of the ACC-FCS games this year.
Correction
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 00:34 — Anonymous (not verified)FCS programs do not have "nothing to lose" playing FBS programs. One of the criteria for qualifying for the FCS playoffs as an at large entry is getting 7 wins against Division I opponents. Scheduling a non-terrible FBS team reduces the opportunities to get those wins. Most consider it worth the risk for the sake of the guarantee, the increase in profile, and the opportunity to give exceptional FCS athletes a chance to show what they can do against top level competition, even if their teammates aren't up to the task of producing a victory. And then you have programs like New Hampshire that have beaten their last 3 FBS opponents and will probably register their 4th straight this year.
In any case, if you think guarantees for visiting FBS opponents are high now, how much more do you think they'd demand if FCS teams were removed from the market? We want to make money. You want to lose less money. What's the big deal? So it's a game between a team with 85 scholarship athletes vs. a team with typically 63 scholarship athletes. Within the FCS, we have teams with 63 schollies and teams that are completely non-scholarship. Which is the bigger gap? Scholarship gaps are ignored in every Division I sport except FBS football. These are all amateur athletes. Play ball and settle it on the field, not in your financial statements.
Like it or not..
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 09:32 — JPDOhioLike it or not the current system is here to stay. ASU-Michigan notwithstanding, the scholarship gap is a huge advantage for FBS schools. The risk of an unlikely upset is far outweighed by the benefit of the extra money received and a probable win that counts for bowl contention.
On the FCS side, the extra money can have a huge impact on an athletic department budget. The impact of an almost certain loss can be devastating when an at large bid is at stake, because teams with only 3 losses can have serious bubble problems. As an alum of Youngstown State, I've experienced the highs and lows of being in that position.
There is another problem that good FCS programs face that I haven't seen mentioned yet. At least at YSU, we have had trouble scheduling non-conference games. Part of the reason is that some FCS programs and many lower-tier FBS programs don't want to risk a loss by scheduling a strong FCS program. So, scheduling a games with a BCS school takes care of a date that may be tough to fill otherwise.
Still, it basically comes down to money. That's why this won't change and we will never see an FBS playoff.
What a bunch of Cowards
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 00:26 — Anonymous (not verified)What a bunch of Cowards UNC Chapel Hill is.....they dodge App State and their inbred students yak about playing an FCS team. Telling App State that they cannot play them this year because they are going to schedule another BCS team, then a week later scheduleing McNeese State, an out of state FCS team......what liars. Yeah, they have a new coach, and will probably be a little better, but they are not going to set the world on fire probably. Pathetic. I would be ashamed to have gone to Chapel Hill.
You GOTTA be a Florida Gator fan
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 23:13 — LMFAO!! (not verified)b/c you wrote this stupidness:
"study harder and get into DUIke, NCSU, Wake or UNC and then you'll write what I just wrote to all the morons who went to App or Elon. period."
I'll be certain to inform my Ivy League friends that they need to "study harder" to get into NC State.
ASU VS NCSU Entrance Trivia
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 15:55 — Anonymous (not verified)The average SAT score and GPA of incomming freshman is higher at ASU than NCSU this year. BTW, I went to NCSU. Just a fact.
gville gator
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 22:43 — rdm07 (not verified)Just to set it straight. ASU has the second highest SAT scores behind only UNC-CH in the UNC system (that's ahead of NCSU so you don't have to strain yourself). I was accepted to all the schools I applied to included UVa, WFU, Duke, etc. and chose to go to ASU. It was and is more friendly and superior in my major. It is not just for "morons" who could not get into an ACC school. Other moron-infested FCS schools include Furman, Richmond, W&M, Cal-Poly, UMass, UConn and such low brow universities as the ENTIRE Ivy League. The ACC includes such bastions of upper education, especially for athletes, as the Fla thug twins Miami and FSU. There are definately morons here...but I think you have made it clear that they are not FCS fans. And yes ASU, would have finished at least mid-pack in the ACC (barring injuries due to our fewer scholarships) last year. And before you say I now nothing about college football...at least I played college FB for 4 years...and you? It doesn't make me an expert, but a man who lives in China has a better understanding of the country than a man who has only watched it on TV.
and you seem to have no
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 10:22 — gvillegatrand you seem to have no idea what kind of school Miami is. you say you got into all those great schools ... the way you write contradicts all of that.
smoking dope and hanging out at Mellow Mushroom is not a major by the way!!
Snicker
Thu, 08/21/2008 - 12:55 — rdm07 (not verified)You question my writing skills on a comment board??? WOW! Of course I could pointy out your lack of knowledge concerning capitalization, but its a comment board for crying out loud. I was accepted to the aforementioned schools (noty that I feel the need to justify myself to U). I chose to attend and play at ASU because Sparky Woods was the only Coach that honored his scholarship offer after I suffered an injury my senior year in HS and I just enjoyed my visit to App more than any of the other schools I toured. My point was that your as(s)ertion that only morons go to FCS schools b/c they could not get into an ACC school is 100% rubbish. Of course you did not try to argue that point...b/c you can't.
to all you hard on DIv 1 -aa
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 21:15 — gvillegatrto all you hard on DIv 1 -aa fans ... i'll make my point short and sweet.
Div 1 fotball teams have everything to lose and nothing to gain by playing you guys. thats it. quit your crying. study harder and get into DUIke, NCSU, Wake or UNC and then you'll write what I just wrote to all the morons who went to App or Elon. period.
It isn't about where you went to school
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 22:28 — ASU-Alum82 (not verified)Hey Gator. Just a brief comment. It isn't about where you went to school. It's about what you do with the education you received. I attended ASU because it had the best program in the state for the area I wanted to study. I certainly didn't settle for a lesser education. Besides I am not sure of the quality of the education a student receives at schools where the majority of undergrad courses are taught by Teaching Assistants and not professors with Ph.Ds. I am certainly glad I had those Ph.Ds inspiring me. I really benefited from their research and experience.
By-the-way the last time I checked it has been quite a few years since FSU was named "National Champions" or even in contention to be named "National Champion". Its a shame there is so much money tied up in the bowls to keep a real playoff system from existing. 1-AA and the other non-BCS divisions have exciting games too. So come join us in Boone this fall and enjoy great football and great fans.
Dear gvillegatr
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 22:03 — Justen (not verified)I'll make my response short and sweet. Your comment is completely ignorant to say only dumb people and those that don't work hard go to FCS schools and that’s the only reason why they are there. I guess you went to a Div-1AA school since you can't spell Duke...
Justen, look whose
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 20:05 — gvillegatrJusten,
look whose talking about spelling!! "JUSTEN????" what happened to the "I"
anyway,
I never called anyone ignorant as you suggested I did. I said "study harder." I'll agree some majors at some schools are better than others no matter what the schools reputation is. but lets face it. its harder to get into any of the Big 4 schools than ASU across the board. you know that. dont try to get into this head!! lol.
BTW,
DUIke stands for DUI as in JJ Reddicks and the athletic director and his son as well.
4
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 14:33 — melvinfurdThe correct spelling is "Dook".
However, "DUIke" is a clever, intentional misspelling of "Dook".
Deep breath, App fans
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 20:52 — jpg (author)There wasn't room in this manifesto for your particular case, Appalachian State. You own I-AA. I thought winning the title three times in a row made that point abundantly clear.
Alas, I will expand. You are the exception. To the point that few I-A teams want to play you. ESPN had to provide the proper incentive to LSU to get that game done. And as I pointed out in the post, Virginia Tech might be the last of the Mohicans since UNC and FSU, among others, aren't interested in an actual challenge, merely the payday.
I realize you're carrying the flag for I-AA teams here but you're both missing and proving my point. I-A teams have nothing to gain by playing a I-AA team and everything to lose.
Ask Michigan.
Conversely, I-AA teams, even the good ones, have nothing to lose and everything to gain.
That's why teams have and will continue to avoid ASU and schedule Wofford or Gardner-Webb. ASU can beat its share of I-A teams, although history will note you lost to a 3-9 N.C. State team in 2006 (that was for you Garner Yosef disciples).
Finally, this has nothing to do with the quality of football in the ACC or my apparent deep-seeded love for UNC and Duke (Gville Gator is chuckling somewhere).
It's about the I-A teams deliberately subjecting their paying audience to lopsided games — that with the exception of ones involving ASU or Duke — that are decided before the coin toss.
And speaking of exceptions, if/when Duke loses, it would prove my point further. Duke would be better off losing to Rice than facing a top-10 I-AA team in a new coach's first game. Although it should be noted that JMU, a I-AA playoff team in 2007, got worked by a 4-8 UNC team last season.
Oh, and seriously, thanks for visiting, App fans. Introduce yourself to the Washington fans, who are also new here. Enjoy your run at a fourth straight title.
— JPG
ESPN had to provide the
Wed, 08/20/2008 - 07:45 — agentpreppieESPN had to provide the proper incentive to LSU to get that game done.
Wrong. App was on their schedule for next season. The game was pushed up a year because Texas Tech backed out on LSU and App was still searching for a game on Aug 30. App is also on Florida's schedule in a few years.
Oh, and seriously, thanks for visiting, App fans. Introduce yourself to the Washington fans, who are also new here.
We're not visiting, we've always been here and always been frustrated by the N&O's lack of coverage of App.
Response from one of the two Garner Yosef Disciples mentioned
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 21:41 — Justen (not verified)To start I will address the comment made about Appalachain losing to a 3-9 NC State team. The team that took the field that day is no where in comparison of the team that took the field two weeks later as Armanti Edwards became the starter and has since led the team to a 22-2 record as a starter. That same team is the one that took the field on September 1st 2007 and beat the number 5 ranked team in the nation, a feat I doubt any NC State team could have accomplished in the past 4 years.
As for the remainder of the article everything is completely true!! The system that the NCAA had in place when a Div-1 team could only count a Div-1aa game towards their wins for a bowl game was the perfect system. There is no reason the FCS (formally Div-1AA) teams should be playing Div-1A teams. Not only is this bad for the big time schools i would also argue that it is bad for the FCS teams as well. As much as i loved watching Appalachian beat Michigan last year it was a once in a lifetime game. I would much rather see Appalachian schedule a tough out of conference FCS team such as James Madison or Nothern Iowa then watch us go to LSU during primetime and more then likely watch us lose.
In addition, ranking the teams at the end of the season becomes harder for the FCS when you have teams playing one or two games against Div-1A teams that season. Which team is better, team A who plays all their games in the FCS and only has one or two losses or team B that plays two games against Div-1A and has 3 or 4 losses??
As exciting as it is to see David Vs. Goliath and watch a once in a lifetime game where Appalchian State beats Michigan, there are 200 games that ended in blow outs to get to that point that have no excitement what-so-ever. In my opinion the whole thing should be done away with and each division should play games against only those teams in their division.
i've hit a new plateau!!
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 21:20 — gvillegatri've hit a new plateau!!
Spoke like a true "Duke/ UNC
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 20:12 — Anonymous (not verified)Spoke like a true "Duke/ UNC (didn't go there) fan." If Duke/ UNC didn't have FCS teams to play, they wouldn't have a chance to go to a bowl game. Come on, why is it so scary for the "big boys" to play I-AA teams--after all they do have 22 more scholarship players? Sure, your argument is for the betterment of ACC fans, like the ones who support Duke football and all the joy that program has brought it's fans. Give me break. Go to the game between ASU and JMU this year and you will see better football then you do in half the ACC.
Don't you think the FCS players and fans enjoy the FBS game
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 18:18 — Anonymous (not verified)You are writing this as if the legion of Duke, NC State and UNC fans are the only ones out there. The SoCon teams of GaSo, Furman, The Citadel, Elon and App have significant fan bases. 10k fans showed upr for ASU scrimmage - Duke is lucky to get that many to a game.
Cover the FCS - It is where the best, pure college game is played. No cheating - few arrested players- Players GRADUATE from the Universities - Coaches make 100-150k rather that 1-4 million. Besides - THE NCAA ONLY NAMES ONE DIVISION ONE CHAMP IN FOOTBALL and the last 3 years IT WAS APPLACHIAN STATE.
I-AA/FCS Name Change
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 17:56 — Anonymous (not verified)The I-AA to FCS name change had nothing to do with "political correctness." It was done because schools that were putting a lot of money into their I-AA football programs were getting all of their sports programs referred to as Division I-AA (no such thing exists outside football), while schools that spent no money on football at all were being called Division I. Should a school with no football be perceived as being in a higher division than a school playing FCS football, and putting in all the millions of dollars necessary to support it? That's why they separated the designation from the Division I name.
Btw, if the ACC doesn't take matters seriously they could go 0-3 in the August 30th subdivision games. Those are all top 10 teams in the FCS preseason polls. Richmond too.
Please, FCS, 1AA, whatever
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 17:27 — FCS Guy (not verified)Please, FCS, 1AA, whatever you want to call it, it's the REAL Division 1 National Championship. Decided on the field, not by some computer ranking. 1A football is a joke, 6-5 or 6-6 and you're play in a garbage bowl, yeah, that's something to compete for.
Now, i do agree two FCS teams are 1 too many, but you will never eliminate it completely. Which is good, for us maybe, just not Michigan. What an embarrassment.
Be Real
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 17:03 — Matt (not verified)Let's be honest here these games a mutually beneficial. ACC schools get a pay day, the FCS schools get that chance to play with the big FBS teams. I would also venture to think that anyone in ACC country would much rather see Furman-Clemson, NCSU-Appalachian, or any other in state FCS v FBS game than seeing, ACC v Sunbelt, WAC, MAC, or Mountain West Teams
FCS
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 16:38 — Bostonspider (not verified)So UVA is playing instate rival UR instead of some crappy MAC / Sunbelt team. Well I would think that be more interesting to their fans. I would guess more people in Charlottesville and beyond have some connection to Richmond than to say North Texas, or Buffalo. UVA is also balancing this game with a visit from Southern Cal. And it is not like UR and UVA do not have history having playing each other with around 30 games between them. And the last time they played in 2001, UVA squeeked by with a one point victory, 17-16. So again, why should they not be playing?
Stealin' from the rich, givin' to the poor
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 16:16 — Robin Hood (not verified)I can see and concede nearly every point in the article. But, come on, hasn't "1-A football" become synonymous with "Bureaucracy?" The entire division has a hierarchy of major 1-A vs. the smaller less notable 1-A (Sunbelt). Even the National Championship is an (subjective) opinion rooted in pedigree as much as anything else. Of the ACC games mentioned, 2 or more may actually result in defeat: JMU, McNeese St. Tis true, ACC fans do lose on these games with lesser teams - but if it were about good games, Duke should have been out of the league long ago. Most importantly, the system should remain open to 1-AA schools simply for parity's sake. There are schools that aspire to a greater status (Marshall, Troy were 1-AA only 5 years ago or so) - and there are 1-A schools that can't seem to get their programs together. Let the N Dakota St (Minnesota) Appalachian States (Michigan) of the world threaten embarrassment for the sake of sport, if nothing else. This way, the rich don't continue to get richer, and the poor, poorer.
Stop whining.
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 16:01 — Anonymous (not verified)Please stop the whining about playing 1-aa schools. The ACC is a vastly overrated conference with only a handful of good schools (Florida State, VT etc.) NC State and UNC are jokes and playing 1-aa is more than just being financially beneficial. With sub-par schools such as those, a win over a 1-aa might mean a bowl berth
You're just asking for it, aren't you?
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 15:23 — Appan (not verified)App State is - and has always been - a Division I football program.
App State owns the D1 football championship by winning an NCAA tournament and getting an NCAA trophy. I-A/FBS schools compete to win a BCS championship and get a trophy sponsored by Sears.
Please enlighten your readers as to the true purpose of college football programs - to ensure powerhouse athletic contests each weekend so sports writers can write epic stories of triumph and despair, or to make a buck?
True football fans don't care who their teams play, as will be evidenced by the 92,000 who will see LSU-App State play later this month (let's not forget that ESPN audience).
A game is a game. It's the writers who continually whine (But only about football mismatches, never the first round of March Madness).
FCS, BCS its all about the game
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 15:11 — ASU-Alum82 (not verified)It is utter nonsense that teams who haven't a snowballs chance at being elected to "National Champion" status are worried about playing 1-AA schools. Michigan took ASU for granted because of their lesser status and it cost them the game, sullied their reputation as a big time football school, and made Boone a household word for a little while. The lesson is never discount an opponent. The 1-AA schools may not have the 60,000+ seat stadiums or the hype about their programs. But they have loyal fans, players who play to win and storied pasts. And most of all they have a true championship at the end of the season.So to the ACC coaches and the other BCS programs all I have to say is get over yourselves, stop being so arrogant and figure out that at the end of the season there can only be one "champion". To the players I say play well, play hard, play to win and make your fans and alumni proud.
Get off your high horse
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 14:57 — Anonymous (not verified)There is a decent possibility that 3 of your ACC teams (Duke, NC, and Maryland) will all lose to these "inferior" FCS or I-AA teams that have 23 less scholarships.
Just add a rule on counting these games
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 14:42 — DFMo (not verified)It seems there is a simple rule to put in place. Play as many 1-AA teams as you want each year but you can only count ONE of those games per year in your 1-A overall record to meet bowl eligibility requirements. That way, all the goodness that comes from these games can continue but should deter more than one per year by a 1-A team. The record of 1-A vs 1-AA games speaks for itself. Pound your chest all you want but its no match.
If you were writing this
Tue, 08/19/2008 - 14:41 — Anonymous (not verified)If you were writing this article for the SEC, I might buy your argument. While I'm an ACC fan, the facts are schools like Appalachian State could win at least 3-4 games (maybe more) if they were a member of the confernce--so don't be so quick to dismiss them. No they aren't likely to beat Virginia Tech, Clemson or perhaps the current Wake Forest--but the rest of the conference, particularly Duke, Carolina, NC State, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Maryland, Miami, Boston College...etc better show up to play.
Hold on--it will be basketball season soon.