COLLEGE PARK, Md. - Thanks to a gritty performance by a hot Maryland team on its senior night, Duke holds only a share of first place in the ACC.
Freshman center Jordan Williams rebounded Landon Milbourne’s miss and laid in the go-ahead basket with 1 minute, 37 seconds remaining Wednesday night as 22nd-ranked Maryland defeated No. 4 Duke 79-72 at Comcast Center.
Jon Scheyer and Nolan Smith both tried to regain the lead with 3-point attempts, but missed. Maryland point guard Greivis Vasquez added a field goal to extend the lead to four, and the Blue Devils couldn’t come back.
Vasquez led Maryland with 20 points on his senior night.
Smith scored 20 points and Scheyer added 19 as Maryland (22-7, 12-3 ACC) won its sixth game in a row to pull into a tie atop the ACC standings with Duke (25-5, 12-3). The Blue Devils saw their eight-game winning streak snapped.
On Saturday, Maryland visits Virginia and Duke plays host to North Carolina in the teams’ final games of the regular season. If they finish tied atop the ACC standings, they will share the regular-season conference title.
According to the ACC’s tie-breaking rules, it appears that Duke would gain the No. 1 seed for the ACC Tournament based on its record against other teams that are in high positions in the standings.
Fired up by its pregame senior night festivities, Maryland roared out to a 10-2 lead as Scheyer missed three shots in the first four minutes. The Blue Devils got a chance to catch their breath, though, because the net they were shooting on needed to be removed from the rim with 16:09 remaining in the first half.
After a seven-minute break, Singler immediately christened the new net with a 3-point shot. But the Terrapins continued to pull away as Eric Hayes and Sean Mosley scored on assorted short jumpers in the lane.
With 6:09 remaining in the half, Maryland led 33-19. Thirty-nine seconds later, Scheyer went to the bench with his second foul. But the Blue Devils, who missed six of their first nine 3-pointers, suddenly got hot.
Singler, Smith and Scheyer made 3-pointers in the final 3:08 of the half. Singler added a three-point play during that stretch, and Duke suddenly trailed just 40-38 at halftime.
Duke took its first lead on a Scheyer 3-pointer 11 seconds after halftime and led by as many as four points early in the second half. But the Terrapins’ excellent defense held Duke without a field goal for 6:26, and Maryland led 54-49 after 6-foot-2 Adrian Bowie made a 3-pointer over 6-10 Mason Plumlee with 11:10 remaining. Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski called timeout and argued with referee Karl Hess, apparently over a questionable backcourt violation Hess called against the Blue Devils.
But suddenly Maryland couldn’t score and Smith began slicing through the Terrapin defense for acrobatic scores in the lane. After spinning to the basket to make a shot and get fouled by Sean Mosley, Smith flexed his arms in a bodybuilder’s pose.
Another layup, which gave Smith seven points in 1:40, reclaimed the lead for Duke at 56-54 with 8:01 remaining.
The teams exchanged leads three times, but Scheyer tied the score at 69-69 on a leaner with 2:04 remaining before Williams’ basket put Maryland ahead for good.







Comments
3:20
Fri, 03/05/2010 - 04:20 — Heels20Don't have much to say, but I know how JPD loves seeing posts from those of us who don't sleep. Just 41:40 til Tip-off!
Bravo
Fri, 03/05/2010 - 10:44 — unc098for an adult, respectful and thoughtful expression of opinions
on the behalf all....exclusions are obvious....keep up the good posting.
unc-98 aka " the loser"
Sat, 03/06/2010 - 11:09 — bluecat69bluecat69THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENTS, I WILL KEEP THE GOOD POSTS COMING, DONT FORGET YOUR BLUEVIL TIGHTS, FOR TONIGHTS SLAUGHTER, OK GO DUKE!!!
You got that right
Fri, 03/05/2010 - 10:24 — JPDOhioAt first, I thought it was a verse from the Bible. You know, given the season the Tar Heels have had this year.
unc-98!!
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 17:12 — bluecat69bluecat69we at duke think unc "the loser--98, is a girl, he wears tights, ok,go duke!!!
ultimate Loser
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 21:27 — heelsno1bc69 is the current and ultimate all-time loser!
HOLES-1!!
Sat, 03/06/2010 - 11:13 — bluecat69bluecat69I AM A BLUEDEVIL-WINNER, U ARE A TAR-HOLE LOSER OK, GET READY FOR YOURBUTT WHIPPING TONIGHT , AND I DONT WANT TO HEAR A BUNCH OF EXCUSES, OK, GO DUKE!!
Is it just me...
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 14:56 — Heels20...or is Dook not really the national title contender their fans think they are?
holes-20!!
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 17:16 — bluecat69bluecat69there is one thing for da-n sure, the holes and wulfpeckers are not contenders for any thing, coach k is great, ol roy is marginal, and skid is down right bad, ok go duke!!!!
Super
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 11:32 — heelsno1Maryland played with tremedous heart and desire over the final 5 minutes. On the other hand, the Blue Dabbles could not make a defensive stand when they needed one. It appears that Assistant Coach Wojo needs to place more emphasis on those "floor-slapping" fundamentals. You take this current bunch of Dookies out of "Hansbrough Indoor", and they are in a world of hurt!
Lastly, it was comical observing "Rat-K" who became totally unglued and completely out of control when Scheyer was whistled for traveling at the top of the key (late in the game) for a crucial turnover. It was the proper call, yet K gestured vehemently his disapproval and sputtered expletives storming down the sideline. Whatever happened to calling technical fouls for such outlandish unsportsmanlike and childish behavior?
if you believe the way
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 14:51 — duke_blueif you believe the way Krzyzewski acted was different than any other coach would have in the same situation, then you are completely...in the head! let's not forget how sid walked off the court without shaking hands....that my friend was classless!!!
granted they lost their composure in the closing minutes and let maryland take it away from them, but to come from 14 down in that atmosphere...anyone else would have been blown out of the gym.
Thanks for confirming the point.
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 16:03 — JPDOhioK acted like any other coach would. And here I thought he was something special. My bad.
Also, last time I looked, no one is putting Sid on a pedestal like Duke fans and the hoops world in general does with K. Sid's storming off the court was a one time event that was wrong, but was in the heat of the moment. Shortly after that he went to the Ga Tech locker room and apologized for it.
K's behavior is consistent-game after game, year after year. Yeah, right or wrong, it is standard behavior for college coaches. Just don't argue that K is some paragon of hoops virtue. If he is going to deified, then he should be held to a higher standard of behavior.
Just one quick question and
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 21:40 — duke_blueJust one quick question and I am going to drop this...
If you were a player and got a bad call from the refs...would you rather have a coach that argues the fact or a coach that just sits back and lets it happen?
I know I would want a coach who is willing to argue the point and risk a technical than just sit there an do nothing or say a little comment to the ref and walk away. Every coach has to be a bully to a certain degree for his players. The players feed off of his/her aggressiveness just as much as they do from the fans. The refs are big boys..they don't have to take it if goes too far.
You could also view Krzyzewski's actions as him being more passionate about winning than other coaches. Just look at Gary Williams...hell I bet after evey game won or lost he has to take a valium and/or smoke weed to calm down.
you may be a Duke fan
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 23:02 — gvillegatrbut I respect your views and opinions. There not always right from where I sit, but I'm not going to make any references at the moment.
you just prove that you can stand and make a point instead of tucking tail and saying you're done posting here b/c more people disagree with you than agree.
just wanted to point that out is all.
foreverduke
Fri, 03/05/2010 - 16:26 — SurferI think you are referring to foreverduke.
thanks for the kind words
Fri, 03/05/2010 - 00:12 — duke_bluethanks for the kind words g....at least I think that was a compliment?
he11 we all have our own views and opinions. same feelings on here toward you guys as well. respect the support you show for your teams and coaches no matter what. the one thing we all have in common...we love our teams and as true fans we go the extra mile to prove it!!
Quick answer
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 23:02 — JPDOhioI have no problem with a passionate coach protecting his players. I do think that the histrionics that are currently allowed in college hoops are over the top, but it is what it is. So be it.
I do not believe that profane tirades are appropriate, especially from a guy who fosters an image as a great leader. Everybody screws up every now and then, especially coaches who have mikes shoved in their faces day in and day out.
So if K is such a fine leader, he shouldn't have to resort to public displays of profanity and bullying tactics. He can't have it both ways. If he wants to project an image of being someone special, he needs to act the part. You know, the old walk the talk stuff.
That, and...
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 23:29 — Heels20...not flipping out on good calls. Yes, it's okay to argue a bad call, and maybe even get a technical to get the crowd pumped up after being forced flaccid (for lack of a better word) by poor calls. But letting obsceneties pour of your mouth over a good call isn't protecting your players, it's just flat out complaining for the sake of complaining. Especially when your senior "leader" last season was Sir (or Lady) Floppopotamus.
Well I said I was going to
Fri, 03/05/2010 - 00:32 — duke_blueWell I said I was going to drop it, but you pushed one more response out of me...plus I can't let gville down.
Your response is valid, if you were looking at it from a spectators point of view. What you have to realize that if you are a coach...every call that went against your team would be a bad call. Therefore you would need to contest every single call that hurt your team. A bad call will deflate your teams aggressiveness in a heartbeat. And the coach is the only one that can keep that from happening. Each coach may claim to be a leader or role model, but we all know that is a load of crap. Schools want a coach who produce a winning program. If they can find one who can do that....being a perfect gentlemen on the court runs a distant second. Let's remember...this is college level (one step away from NBA) not middle school.
Respectfully disagree
Fri, 03/05/2010 - 01:04 — Heels20As a coach, if your player gets fouled and it isn't called, then feel free to let the official know that he messed up. However, if your player picks up his dribble and takes 4 steps and is called for a walk, there is no reason to argue the call. Much less verbally sodomize the ref. Defending your players and keeping the team morale up is one thing. Trying to win the game by intimidating the official into cheating for you is another thing, and that thing is not coaching.
I do agree, however, on the point that schools are looking to win ball games over hiring a gentleman coach. I know it's a different sport, but we saw how that worked out for Carl Torbush and Mike O'Cain.
Disagree on one point
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 16:16 — Heels20K's behavior is indeed consistent game afte game, year after year, but it is not standar behavior for college coaches. Constantly spewing easy-to-read profanity into the ear of an official after what is almost always a good call is not normal coaching behavior.
And I know that someone is going to attack me talking about how Roy Williams ONCE dropped an F-bomb in a post-game conference, or about how he threw a fan out of the Dean Dome (which isn't true). Yes, you see him plead his case to officials, but no further than the extent of a Sidney Lowe or Dino Gaudio. Mike Krzasld;kjf and Seth Greenberg are seen on a consistent basis verbally attacking officials with expletives that would offend Mike Tyson. I respect his coaching ability, but I don't understand people who view him as a role model.
Okay...anyone who looks to
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 17:26 — duke_blueOkay...anyone who looks to a college level coach to be a role model for anything other than coaching skills....is totally misguided. All fans hold their coaches in higher regards to the rest of the coaches.... If you believe your coach has never used profanity on the court...you are in denial and oblivious to the obvious!! So the coach is supposed to go up to the official and say "Excuse me sir, but I really really disagree with the call you just made". Or do you think that saying "really" twice is too harsh also?
I do agree with you on one thing...I totally respect Coach K as well as other coaches for their coaching abilities. So unless you have met any of the coaches....to make a judgement call how they are personally....would be strictly a bias opinion.
Well, here we go
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 17:31 — Heels20Not once did I say that Coach Williams doesn't use profanity on the court. I'm sure he does, as does every coach. However, you do not see him, Lowe, Gaudio, Frank Haith, Tony Bennett, etc constantly screaming obsceneties at officials. That is one difference.
Funny you should mention meeting any of the coaches. I've met both Williams and Lowe, and have close friends (both Carolina and Dook fans) who know Krzyzewski on a personal basis. As you would probably expect, Williams and Lowe are personable people who you can actually have a normal conversation with. It's scary how down to earth they can be. As far as Krzyzewski goes, I've heard good things in that he's willing to talk to people and give them his attention, but he still holds on to that "I am above you" presence. Maybe just a small difference, but a very noticeable one on the court.
The way you emphasized the
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 18:38 — duke_blueThe way you emphasized the word ONCE in your comment about Roy made it sound like you were saying he never used profanity other than that one time. At least that is the way I perceived it.
The emphasis...
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 18:40 — Heels20...was mainly for the poster on here who refers to him as "F-bomb Williams." That one particular incident seems to be the only evidence one ever has to support their argument that Roy Williams is indeed Satan.
wrong
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 15:10 — gvillegatrUNC came back form down more than 17 pts against maryland at Maryland ... only to still get blown out! lol.
but they still came back from a larger margain.
I stand corrected...I guess!
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 16:34 — duke_blueI stand corrected...I guess! lol
Are you kidding?
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 11:52 — JPDOhioK is the John Gotti of college basketball coaching.
For all those indignant Duke fans who wonder why some of us take shots at K, your last paragraph sums it for me. K holds himself out as a leader and role model. Yet the behavior you describe is the exact opposite of how leaders and role models are supposed to act.
And I don't want to hear about how "that's common and necessary" when coaching college hoops. Bull! True leaders rise above boorish behavior. K uses his stature to intimidate refs. Since when are bullying tactics defined as "leadership"?
K is an outstanding basketball coach. He is also a hypocrit.
Ha
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 11:42 — Heels20And they say Roy is classless.
remember the 80's song
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 10:44 — gvillegatrforever young? by Alphaville?
anyway,
I wonder if I could get "foreverduke" back to ACCNow by playing the song Forever Young!?
just a suggestion ...
come on back, man.
I want your analysis on DUIke not being able to put the ball in the hoop in the last couple of mins or get a stop in the last five minutes of the game.
Umm...
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 11:40 — Heels20I'm about 75% sure foreverduke is a woman...