Blogs

newsobserver.com blogs

ACC Now

Heels upset cost ACC

Bookmark and Share

BCS bowl projections:

National championship: Florida vs. Texas
Rose: Iowa vs. Oregon
Orange: Georgia Tech vs. Penn State
Sugar: Alabama vs. Cincinnati
Fiesta: USC vs. TCU

North Carolina's win, and USC's loss, cost the ACC a real shot at $4.5 million.

Virginia Tech, even with two losses, had a strong chance at an at-large bid to a BCS bowl, which was a driving force idea behind expansion. Florida State and Miami both played in BCS games in 2000, 2002 and 2003, but the ACC hasn't sent two teams to the BCS in first five years of expansion, or since the series was formed in 1998.

The Hokies, with their considerable fan base, would have been an attractive at-large choice this season, until Thursday's choke job against the Tar Heels. Now, the ACC's only other hope for a second bid is Miami, which is a long shot at best.

With no traveling fan base but a popular television appeal, Miami's BCS hopes rest on the generosity of the Orange Bowl, and the combination of Penn State, Ohio State and Notre Dame losing.

Remember, the BCS standings only determine the participants in the national championship game. The other four games are contractually obligated to certain conferences and free to choose from the top 14. Most importantly, bowl games are for-profit ventures, in terms of both selling tickets and television advertisements. They don't care if your team is No. 5 in the BCS rankings, only if your team can make them money.

The Sugar, Fiesta and Orange bowls have contracted conference anchors and then choose from a pool of eligible candidates. (The Rose Bowl, whenever possible, takes the champions from Pac-10 and Big Ten.)

The selection process for the Sugar, Fiesta and Orange is a draft. The bowls that lose their anchor champions to the national title game get to choose first with the bowl that loses the No. 1 team selecting first, followed by the bowl that loses the No. 2 team.

So, if the SEC champion, likely either Florida or Alabama, were to play Texas in the BCS title game, and the SEC champion stays ranked No. 1 in the BCS standings (currently Florida), then the selection order would be:

1. Sugar
2. Fiesta
3. Orange
4. Orange
5. Fiesta
6. Sugar

The SEC runner-up goes to the Sugar and the Fiesta would almost certainly select USC. Oregon's 47-20 win knocked the Trojans out of the Rose Bowl and in the process made the Pac-10 $4.5 million, and a two-team BCS league for the first time.

If USC had won, an at-large spot would have been opened up for the ACC and a two-loss Virginia Tech team. Without the extra spot, and its most attractive second candidate, the ACC is reduced to relying on the Orange Bowl's generosity and multiple losses by big-name teams.

The Orange is contractually obligated to take the ACC champion, which as of today looks like Georgia Tech. With the next pick, the Orange could take the Big East champion, but in the case of Cincinnati, it would mean taking a team with a limited fan base for the second straight season. The Orange, again in the interest of making money, would almost certainly choose Penn State, Ohio State or Notre Dame over any potential Big East champion, even an unbeaten Cincinnati team.

Given GT's inability to sell tickets, there's little chance the Orange could afford to say no to a big-name school, but it's the only hope the ACC has for a second team.

If the Orange takes the Big East champion, there's one at-large spot open. Either Boise State or Texas Christian, as a top-12 automatic qualifier, has to go to somewhere, likely the Fiesta, and that leaves the Sugar with the dealer's choice.

If the ACC somehow convinces the Orange to take the Big East champ, Miami (17) would still have to win out — and the Canes looked shaky in beating Wake, 28-27 on Saturday — and then hope a second Big Ten team and Notre Dame do not qualify.

Only two teams per conference are allowed in the BCS pool, which eliminates LSU (No. 9 but the third SEC team) and either Penn State (11) or Ohio State (16).

Penn State hosts Ohio State on Saturday. Miami, and the ACC, needs Ohio State to win and then a pick up a loss in subsequent weeks to either Iowa (currently in first place in the Big Ten and fourth in the BCS) or Michigan or in both.

Notre Dame, of course, is the wild card. With no conference affiliation, the Irish automatically qualifies with a top-8 finish, which is unlikely considering it's ranked No. 22 this week. But the Irish become eligible if it finishes in the top 14. The Irish (6-2) would have to win out — against Navy, Pitt, UConn and Stanford — and get help from the opponents of the teams in front of them to jump into at-large pool.

If none of the big name schools qualify, that would leave Miami — if it can beat Virginia, UNC, Duke and South Florida — in the at-large pool with a second Big East team (the fan-strapped Cincy-Pitt loser) or a second Big 12 team (a weak Oklahoma State team).

The real loser is either TCU (6) or Boise State (7), and it looks like Boise State given the remainder of its schedule does not offer the Broncos a chance to impress the computers or human pollsters and jump TCU.

Only one team from outside the six qualifying conferences is guaranteed a spot for finishing in the top 12. Given the relatively small fan bases of both, it would either be Boise or TCU, but not both, and certainly not TCU which can't sell out its home games.

Miami wouldn't sell a ton of tickets, or even its allotment, but the Canes are proven television ratings winner and if Florida happened to lose in the SEC title game, a Miami-Florida matchup would be a consolation prize the Sugar would be happy to have fall in its lap. Unless, of course, they could get Urban Meyer-vs.-Notre Dame.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Unreal

JPG-

Your assertion that UNC cost the ACC millions is just more of the same old tired, jaded perspective that pervades your posts. A more appropriate and fairer headline would have read...VT's stumble likely costs ACC millions. If VT did a major "choke job" (your words, not mine) by losing at home on national TV to a 16.5 point underdog, then did the Hokies really deserve to go to a major BCS bowl in the first place? Perhaps Beamer and VT blew millions for the ACC by not protecting their home field advantage against a hungry UNC team.

It must be a serious challenge being JPG, so I wish you the best going forward.

Sad

Almost 1,000 words on the BCS and the selection process and UNC fans, or anti-JPG fans, focus on one word about their team.

The post is about the ACC and it's loss of money with Virginia Tech's loss, yet you have somehow turned this into how much I supposedly hate UNC.

Classic.

— JPG

YOU Can't BE Serious !!!!!!!

Outside of GA Tech...the rest of the ACC is pure 100% DOGMEAT.......and should only be going to their usual KENNEL Bowls....... BOW WOW !!!!!

DOOK / Tar Holes...YOU Can't Be SERIOUS.........total STIFFS !!!!

F*** ALL the BCS Buffoons !!!

ACC and BCS

If GT wins out...they will probably be around 7th, 8th in BCS before the ACC-CG.
If Clemson wins out...they will probably be ranked around 15th give or take 3 spots. Then Clemson wins the ACC-CG...
Clemson goes to Orange bowl....GT goes to one of the other BCS bowls....There is your two ACC teams in BCS bowls. Imean how far could GT really fall for losing to a ranked team in the championship game....Think about it

Heels

better worry about their next game and not "running up the score on State on 11/28".......guess you forgot about the last two times UNC played Tom O'Brien....

Could you do a little better job?

Could you at least make an effort to disguise your Heel hatred, instead of making your writing resemble the stuff on the free board at Packpride.com?

"Choke job", indeed. You wouldn't be whining if State had beaten FSU about how that was bad for the conference. I can't wait until you whine about UNC running up the score on State on 11/28.

Best he can

jblues,

I see your point and it is well taken, but I think that JG is doing about the best that he can. Actually, as a Tar Heel, I get a little chuckle out of his terse, subtle, little jabs at UNC. It adds spice and a bit of humor, all in one, for some.

In addition to that, he magnifies and promotes the State mantra in such a timely fashion, such that as it implodes and falls to the ground, he is right there to take the heat.

Remember, this is all in fun. For example, if UNC beats State, the headline could read, "UNC's Butch Davis finally beats TOB and the Wolfpack", or "After last year's 41-10 beatdown in Chapel Hill, State fades to UNC in the last game of the season", or "UNC outlasts NCSU 59-10".

 

Not whining

A 16.5-point favorite lost at home? What would you like me to call it?

— JPG

PS Get over yourself

to JPG

How about giving the Heels credit?  They should have beaten Fla. St., but "choked" (to use familiar words....)  Reality - the Heels played a fantastic game against the Hokies (much like last year), and pretty much dominated them. Biased has no place in sports writing - if you can't be unbiased, don't cover the teams you hate....

And just a quick note to all those "Why did BD let Cam Sexton go?" complainers - I'm a huge Tarheel fan, always have been, always will be, but here's a reality check again...Sexton transferred to a D-II school called Catawba(of which I am an alum) and lost his starting position because he played horribly.  He actually cost the Indians 2 games because he played so poorly.  Do I like Yates?  Not really...but he's what we've got and we should support him and the team.  No "fair-weather" fans allowed -pull for them when it's up and pull for them when it's down or go pull for someone else.

wwhhooaaaaa

just b/c someone rails on a player doesn't mean they hate the team and are considered "fair weather" as you stated.  the same people who have complained about Yates are the same people who come here everyday to post.  so step down off your high horse and lets all enjoy the rest of UNC's football games.   here's an imaginary beer for you.  cheers!

 

 

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

About the blogger

J.P. Giglio covers the ACC for the News & Observer, where he has worked since 1997.

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of newsobserver.com. Click here to register or to log in.
Advertisements